

Writing Limitations of Research Study — 4 Reasons Why It Is Important!

It is not unusual for researchers to come across the term limitations of research during their academic paper writing. More often this is interpreted as something terrible. However, when it comes to research study, limitations can help structure the research study better. Therefore, do not underestimate significance of limitations of research study.
Allow us to take you through the context of how to evaluate the limits of your research and conclude an impactful relevance to your results.
Table of Contents
What Are the Limitations of a Research Study?
Every research has its limit and these limitations arise due to restrictions in methodology or research design. This could impact your entire research or the research paper you wish to publish. Unfortunately, most researchers choose not to discuss their limitations of research fearing it will affect the value of their article in the eyes of readers.
However, it is very important to discuss your study limitations and show it to your target audience (other researchers, journal editors, peer reviewers etc.). It is very important that you provide an explanation of how your research limitations may affect the conclusions and opinions drawn from your research. Moreover, when as an author you state the limitations of research, it shows that you have investigated all the weaknesses of your study and have a deep understanding of the subject. Being honest could impress your readers and mark your study as a sincere effort in research.

Why and Where Should You Include the Research Limitations?
The main goal of your research is to address your research objectives. Conduct experiments, get results and explain those results, and finally justify your research question . It is best to mention the limitations of research in the discussion paragraph of your research article.
At the very beginning of this paragraph, immediately after highlighting the strengths of the research methodology, you should write down your limitations. You can discuss specific points from your research limitations as suggestions for further research in the conclusion of your thesis.
1. Common Limitations of the Researchers
Limitations that are related to the researcher must be mentioned. This will help you gain transparency with your readers. Furthermore, you could provide suggestions on decreasing these limitations in you and your future studies.
2. Limited Access to Information
Your work may involve some institutions and individuals in research, and sometimes you may have problems accessing these institutions. Therefore, you need to redesign and rewrite your work. You must explain your readers the reason for limited access.
3. Limited Time
All researchers are bound by their deadlines when it comes to completing their studies. Sometimes, time constraints can affect your research negatively. However, the best practice is to acknowledge it and mention a requirement for future study to solve the research problem in a better way.
4. Conflict over Biased Views and Personal Issues
Biased views can affect the research. In fact, researchers end up choosing only those results and data that support their main argument, keeping aside the other loose ends of the research.
Types of Limitations of Research
Before beginning your research study, know that there are certain limitations to what you are testing or possible research results. There are different types that researchers may encounter, and they all have unique characteristics, such as:
1. Research Design Limitations
Certain restrictions on your research or available procedures may affect your final results or research outputs. You may have formulated research goals and objectives too broadly. However, this can help you understand how you can narrow down the formulation of research goals and objectives, thereby increasing the focus of your study.
2. Impact Limitations
Even if your research has excellent statistics and a strong design, it can suffer from the influence of the following factors:
- Presence of increasing findings as researched
- Being population specific
- A strong regional focus.
3. Data or statistical limitations
In some cases, it is impossible to collect sufficient data for research or very difficult to get access to the data. This could lead to incomplete conclusion to your study. Moreover, this insufficiency in data could be the outcome of your study design. The unclear, shabby research outline could produce more problems in interpreting your findings.
How to Correctly Structure Your Research Limitations?
There are strict guidelines for narrowing down research questions, wherein you could justify and explain potential weaknesses of your academic paper. You could go through these basic steps to get a well-structured clarity of research limitations:
- Declare that you wish to identify your limitations of research and explain their importance,
- Provide the necessary depth, explain their nature, and justify your study choices.
- Write how you are suggesting that it is possible to overcome them in the future.
In this section, your readers will see that you are aware of the potential weaknesses in your business, understand them and offer effective solutions, and it will positively strengthen your article as you clarify all limitations of research to your target audience.
Know that you cannot be perfect and there is no individual without flaws. You could use the limitations of research as a great opportunity to take on a new challenge and improve the future of research. In a typical academic paper, research limitations may relate to:
1. Formulating your goals and objectives
If you formulate goals and objectives too broadly, your work will have some shortcomings. In this case, specify effective methods or ways to narrow down the formula of goals and aim to increase your level of study focus.
2. Application of your data collection methods in research
If you do not have experience in primary data collection, there is a risk that there will be flaws in the implementation of your methods. It is necessary to accept this, and learn and educate yourself to understand data collection methods.
3. Sample sizes
This depends on the nature of problem you choose. Sample size is of a greater importance in quantitative studies as opposed to qualitative ones. If your sample size is too small, statistical tests cannot identify significant relationships or connections within a given data set.
You could point out that other researchers should base the same study on a larger sample size to get more accurate results.
4. The absence of previous studies in the field you have chosen
Writing a literature review is an important step in any scientific study because it helps researchers determine the scope of current work in the chosen field. It is a major foundation for any researcher who must use them to achieve a set of specific goals or objectives.
However, if you are focused on the most current and evolving research problem or a very narrow research problem, there may be very little prior research on your topic. For example, if you chose to explore the role of Bitcoin as the currency of the future, you may not find tons of scientific papers addressing the research problem as Bitcoins are only a new phenomenon.
It is important that you learn to identify research limitations examples at each step. Whatever field you choose, feel free to add the shortcoming of your work. This is mainly because you do not have many years of experience writing scientific papers or completing complex work. Therefore, the depth and scope of your discussions may be compromised at different levels compared to academics with a lot of expertise. Include specific points from limitations of research. Use them as suggestions for the future.
Have you ever faced a challenge of writing the limitations of research study in your paper? How did you overcome it? What ways did you follow? Were they beneficial? Let us know in the comments below!

Excellent article ,,,it has helped me big
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.

Enago Academy's Most Popular

- Manuscript Preparation
- Publishing Research
- Reporting Research
Research Problem Statement — Find out how to write an impactful one!
What Is a Research Problem Statement? A research problem statement is a clear, concise, and…

- Industry News
- Publishing News
2022 in a Nutshell — Reminiscing the year when opportunities were seized and feats were achieved!
It’s beginning to look a lot like success! Some of the greatest opportunities to research…
- Old Webinars
- Webinar Mobile App
A Comprehensive Series on Clinical Research Writing: Part I — Protocol Writing
Importance of research protocol How to structure a research protocol Common pitfalls to avoid

- Language & Grammar
What Makes a Thesis Statement Spectacular? — 5 things to know
What Is a Thesis Statement? A thesis statement is a declarative sentence that states the…

- Manuscripts & Grants
How to Increase the Visibility of Your Research Paper With the Help of SEO
While there is no single, agreed-upon rubric for ranking research papers, various SEO strategies can…
How to Develop a Good Research Question? — Types & Examples
5 Effective Ways to Avoid Ghostwriting for Busy Researchers
Top 5 Key Differences Between Methods and Methodology
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
- 2000+ blog articles
- 50+ Webinars
- 10+ Expert podcasts
- 50+ Infographics
- 10+ Checklists
- Research Guides
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:

For what are you most likely to depend on AI-assistance?
Thank you for your interest in our company.
Unfortunately, we are not hiring writers now due to low season.
We will be glad to review your application in the future.

Make sure there's no plagiarism in your paper
Write your essays better and faster with free samples
Generate citations for your paper free of charge
Learn How to Write Limitations of a Research Paper
Published 17 Feb 2023
The limitations in a research paper are related to your methodology peculiarities or the set of tools that have been used, impacted, or affected the results you’ve obtained during the research stages. To learn how to write limitations of a research paper, you have to understand the main purpose, which is to talk about limitations that influence the basic clarity and validity of your findings. For example, you could deal with the sample size, talking about customers in Arizona while surveying a specific group of people with, e.g., a higher income. At the same time, it may involve your data collection process, the equipment you have used, or the methods with certain limitations.
Even though the limitations one describes are always different and can represent specific types, this research paper section must always be placed either at the very start of the discussion paragraph in your paper or outlined after the same discussion section. Most research paper writers use their research limitations at the beginning to guarantee that the readers understand what to anticipate as they read further. If you want to warn your readers about something, write the limitations section of a research paper in the beginning. If you want to summarize it differently by defining an issue, do so at the end.
How to Write a Limitations Section: A Step-by-Step Guide
Before you start working on the limitations aspect of your Discussion section, remember that it should be clear as you have to either explain the possible issue or eliminate it per se. Before you start, take the following steps to make things clear:
- Determine the flaws and weaknesses of your study by defining where the problem lies. For example, you may only be able to work with critical data or become the first person to explore something with supporting evidence based on similar research reports. Still, you must explain how these flaws can be solved in future examinations.
- Do not use excuses! Refrain from using the limitations to cover up the lack of research because you have to analyze things first and determine how to address the problem. After all, the limitations of a research study may be related to logistics or the inability to get specific information.
- Use concise terms and practical examples! Do not just say that you cannot provide deeper research but explain why.
- Provide practical solutions if possible! You can refer to your methodology section and explain how it could help address the problem.
- Connect your limitations to the existing methodology. Discuss why this problem is general and support it with citations if and when possible.
- Describe how other researchers have faced similar limitations. Talk about the recommendations and the necessity for further research.
Why Should You Include Limitations in a Research Paper?
The main purpose is to strengthen your research and take time to discuss, explain, and identify problems or limitations before other researchers or professional reviewers. It also helps to place your findings in the general research context by actually helping to interpret the validity of your claims.
Estimate Study Value
Since the talk goes about a discussion part, it represents an executive summary for research where you explain your work's pros and cons. Besides, you should estimate the value and discuss what limitation of a study has been encountered based on your methodology and used tools. Since it must go beyond systematic or statistical mistakes, it's necessary to analyze things twice to determine whether they are worth mentioning without ruining your research paper's writing credibility.
Narrow Things Down
Another important aspect of including the limitations of a research paper is narrowing things down and learning to remain critical of one's writing and research work. It helps researchers to explain what kind of efforts have been made and how certain issues have been approached. Additionally, it explains the researcher’s take regarding limitations in a study based on the methodology and circumstances that may also act as possible limitations (geography, cultural points, financial issues, and more). When a person starts reading the discussion section, a sufficient explanation shows how to process and read the paper.
The Types of Limitations
Since there are numerous research methods and approaches to the same problem, researchers fall to various limitation types. When you are ready to work on your Discussion section, it's crucial to examine your methodology again and mention it more than once. It's just as important as including your research methods when you write an abstract and explain why something has been done in a specific way. As you outline this part, make sure to review the most common limitations:
- Data Sample Size. Approaching limitations in research is one of the most common issues people face. If your sample size is too small or you cannot survey all the types of people you describe, it must be mentioned as a limitation.
- Lack of Reliable Research Data . Unless you narrow things down to something specific, very little reliable data can be used as evidence.
- No Prior Research On Your Subject. If you are the first person to research something or take an innovative approach, the lack of similar research projects must be mentioned as one of the limitations.
- Poor References. You should choose only valid and verified quotes that can be referenced and obtained by turning to an online database or a physical library.
- Tools Used to Collect Data. The tools may represent a problem by posing limits like access to technology or bias of certain questions towards an answer.
- Information That You Report Yourself. You must be ready to defend the information you obtained based on your research. Ensure to provide examples or explanations to assert your point since it will take a lot of work to verify your findings independently.
Examples of Limitations in Research Projects
It will always be based on your writing style and tone. Remember that talking about limitations should not be a way to degrade your research paper! Discuss strengths and limitations to keep things balanced and convince your readers as they read your ideas and specific arguments. As a way to help you understand basic logic, here are two different examples that can be used for a research paper:
Example 1:
Due to the limited sample group of underage students facing bullying in boarding schools, the survey results are somewhat limited. The questions that have been asked are mostly based on the mental side of things, as the healthcare issues like sleep patterns, depression, and suicidal thoughts are not reflected. Therefore, statistical information obtained from healthcare specialists in the field should be evaluated separately from the surveys conducted.
While the first example talks of the limitations related to the sample group and the methods of surveying people, the second example talks about the equipment that posed specific limitations.
Example 2:
The cave recordings done by the current audio equipment, as outlined in Appendix 3, provide better clarity of the low waves compared to the prior recordings offered with analog equipment. Still, the digital ADA conversion and running on battery power have also introduced a low level of dithering. When studying the latest digital samples, it must be added to the analytical equation. While it is not a flaw per se, it is a technical limitation that must be considered when comparing the samples.
Structure and Proofreading Matters!
As you are working on your strengths and weaknesses for a Discussion section, the most important is to keep up with the structure and proofread your writing upon completion. It will make your study limitations fit within the general tone and won’t make your paper sound weak. Remember that the main purpose of adding this part is to warn your fellow researchers and clarify that not every objective has been achieved by stating what barriers you experienced. Now, suppose you are feeling stuck or confused about what to include. In that case, you can always pay for research paper writing and discuss your issues with an expert who can assist you with anything from the thesis to work on your research limitations.
Was this helpful?
Thanks for your feedback, related blog posts, learn how to write the methodology section of a research paper.
The methodology belongs to one of the most important sections of your work because it explains and tells how exactly your research work has been co...
How to Write an Executive Summary for a Research Paper
What is an Executive Summary In a Research Paper? When you are asked to compose an executive summary for your research paper, the main purpose ...
Receive regular updates, discounts, study guides and more
You have subscribed to EduBirdie news.
Thanks for subscribing!
Check your inbox to verify your email.

- The role of limitations in research: why they are important
- How to Organize Limitations of a Research Study
What are the Limitations of a Study (Research)?
Why and where to include limitations in my research paper, common limitations of the researchers.
- Limited Access to Information
Time Limits
Conflicts on biased views and personal issues, different types, 1. research design limitations, 2. impact limitations, 3. data or statistical limitations, how to structure your research limitations correctly, how to set your research limitations, formulation of your objectives and aims, implementation of your data collection methods, what are sample sizes, lacking previous studies in the same field, scope of discussions, concluding thoughts.
When completing a study or any other important work, there are different details that you should include to present its comprehensive and clear description. Sometimes you might even need to hire a thesis writer to help you with the whole writing process. Don’t underrate the section with limitations in research . It plays a big role in the entire process. Some students find it difficult to write this part, while others are reluctant to include it in their academic papers. Don’t underestimate the significance of limitations in research to provide readers with an accurate context of your work and enough data to evaluate the impact and relevance of your results. What is the best way to go about them? Keep reading to find out more.
Every research has its limitations. These limitations can appear due to constraints on methodology or research design. Needless to say, this may impact your whole study or research paper. Most researchers prefer to not discuss their study limitations because they think it may decrease the value of their paper in the eyes of the audience.
Remember that it’s quite important to show your study limitations to your audience (other researchers, editors of journals, and public readers). You need to notice that you know about these limitations and about the impact they may have. It’s important to give an explanation of how your research limitations can affect the conclusions and thoughts drawn from your research.
In this guide, you can read useful tips on how to write limitations on your future research. Read great techniques on making a proper limitations section and see examples to make sure you have got an idea of writing your qualitative research limitations. You need to understand that even if limitations show the weaknesses of your future research, including them in your study can make your paper strengthen because you show all the problems before your readers will discover them by themselves.
Apart from this, when the author points out the study limitations, it means that you have researched all the weak sides of your study and you understand the topic deeply. Needless to say, all the studies have their limitations even if you know how to make research design properly. When you’re honest with your readers, it can impress people much better than ignoring limitations at all.
Every research has certain limitations, and it’s completely normal, but you need to minimize their range of scope in the process. Provide your acknowledgment of them in the conclusion. Identify and understand potential shortcomings in your work.
When discussing limitations in research, explain how they impact your findings because creating their short list or description isn’t enough. Your research may have many limitations. Your basic goal is to discuss the ones that relate to the research questions that you choose for a specific academic assignment.
Limitations of your qualitative research can become clear to your readers even before they start to read your study. Sometimes, people can see the limitations only when they have viewed the whole document. You have to present your study limitations clearly in the Discussion section of a researh paper . This is the final part of your work where it’s logical to place the limitations section. You should write the limitations at the very beginning of this paragraph, just after you have highlighted the strong sides of the research methodology. When you discuss the limitations before the findings are analyzed, it will help to see how to qualify and apply these findings in future research.
Limitations related to the researcher must also be written and shown to readers. You have to provide suggestions on decreasing these limitations in both your and future studies.
Limited Access to Information
Your study may involve some organizations and people in the research, and sometimes you may get problems with access to these organizations. Due to this, you need to redesign and rewrite your study. You need to explain the cause of limited access to your readers.
Needless to say, all the researchers have their deadlines when they need to complete their studies. Sometimes, time constraints can affect your research negatively. If this happened, you need to acknowledge it and mention a need for future research to solve the main problem.
Some researchers can have biased views because of their cultural background or personal views. Needless to say, it can affect the research. Apart from this, researchers with biased views can choose only those results and data that support their main arguments. If you want to avoid this problem, pay your attention to the problem statement and proper data gathering.
Before you start your study or work, keep in mind that there are specific limitations to what you test or possible research results. What are their types? There are different types that students may encounter and they all have unique features, including:
- Research design limitations,
- Impact limitations,
- Data or statistical limitations.
Specific constraints on your population research or available procedures may affect the final outcomes or results that you obtain.
Even if your research has excellent stats and a strong design, it may suffer from the impact of such factors as:
- The field is conductive to incremental findings,
- Being too population-specific.
- A strong regional focus.
In some cases, it’s impossible to collect enough data or enrollment is very difficult, and all that under-powers your research results. They may stem from your study design. They produce more issues in interpreting your findings.
There are strict rules to structure this section of your academic paper where you need to justify and explain its potential weaknesses. Take these basic steps to end up with a well-structured section:
- Announce to identify your research limitations and explain their importance,
- Reflect to provide the necessary depth, explain their nature, and justify your study choices,
- Look forward to suggest how it’s possible to overcome them in the future.
They walk your readers through this section. You need them to make it clear to your target audience that you recognize potential weaknesses in your work, understand them, and can point effective solutions.
No one is perfect. It means that your work isn’t beyond possible flaws, but you need to use them as a great opportunity to overcome new challenges and improve your knowledge. In a typical academic paper, research limitations can relate to these points:
- Formulation of your objectives and aims,
- Implementation of your data collection methods,
- Sample sizes,
- Lack of previous studies in your chosen area,
- The scope of discussions.
Learn to determine them in each one.
Your work has certain shortcomings if you formulate objectives and aims in a very broad manner. What to do in this case? Specify effective methods or ways to narrow your formulation of objectives and aims to increase the level of your study focus.
If you don’t have a lot of experience in collecting primary data, there’s a certain risk that the implementation of your methods has flaws. It’s necessary to acknowledge that.
They depend on the nature of your chosen problem and their significance is bigger in quantitative studies, unlike the qualitative ones. If your sample size is very small, statistical tests will fail to identify important relationships or connections within a particular data set. How to solve this problem? State that other researchers need to base the same study on a larger sample size to end up with more accurate results. To find more information on how to identify a resesrch problem , check our guide.
Writing a literature review is a key step in any scientific work because it helps students determine the scope of existing studies in the chosen area. Why should you use the literature review findings? They are a basic foundation for any researcher who must use them to achieve a set of specific objectives or aims. What if there are no previous works? You may face this challenge if you choose an evolving or current problem for your study or if it’s very narrow.
Feel free to include this point as a shortcoming of your work, no matter what your chosen area is. Why? The main reason is that you don’t have long years of experience in writing scientific papers or completing complex studies. That’s why the depth and scope of your discussions can be compromised in different levels compared to scholars with a lot of expertise. Include certain points from limitations in research. Use them as suggestions for the future.
Any research suffers from specific limitations that range from common flaws to serious problems in design or methodology dissertation has. The ability to set these shortcomings plays a huge role in writing a successful academic paper and earning good grades. What if you lack it? Turn to our professional thesis writers and get their expert consultation on thesis or research paper.
What comes first, the research design or research problem selection? Read on this guide from our dissertation writing service if you are struggling to answer this question. Any research paper is based on the hypothesis, datum, and methodology. These things though are not written down in the instruct...
The methodology is an important part of your dissertation. It describes a broad philosophical underpinning to your chosen research methods, either quantitative or qualitative, to explain to readers your approach better. Make sure that you’re clear about an academic basis for your choice of research ...
Students have to complete different writing assignments, and some of them are utterly complex. Every assignment has the central idea or problem, which is supposed to be discussed and analyzed during the entire work. It’s called a thesis statement. The main objective of the statement is to explain to...
My Homework Done
Expert Writing Services
- How It Works
- Buy homework
- Ace my homework
- Homework writers
- Homework help
- Assignment writing
- Homework Solutions
- Homework Answers
- No Need To Study
- High school
- McGraw-Hill Connect
- Myaccountinglab
- Precalculus
- Word Problem
- Computer Science
- Language arts
- Engineering
- Biochemistry
- Microbiology
Homework is easy with expert tips and advice. And even easier when you have an expert to do it for you.
Limitations in Research: Academic Writing Manual

Ideally, it’s better to highlight and acknowledge your study’s shortcomings instead of leaving them out. That’s because your assessor will most likely point out the limitations of your study. And when discussing your research limitations, don’t just list them with a short description. Instead, explain how the limitations affected the findings of your case study .
A study can have several limitations. However, you should discuss the limitations that relate to the research problems directly. For instance, if you have not highlighted secondary data meta-analysis as a research objective, don’t mention it as a research limitation. A limitation of a study should be anything you can’t control.
What Are Limitations in Research?
Common limitations in research, limitations in a research study that relate to the researcher, how to organize the limitations of research studies, tips for writing limitations to qualitative research.
A limitation in research is a shortcoming or flaw that can result from things like a flawed methodology, small study sample size, and resource unavailability.
A study can’t be inclusive of every possible aspect or completely flawless. As such, including the limitations of a study is essential because it reflects transparency and honesty. It also shows that you understand your study topic.
Study limitations should appear in the discussion part of a research paper before the conclusion. However, don’t come up with an extensive elaboration of the limitation. Instead, keep the limitations crisp and short. Ideally, limitations in qualitative research explain the unanswered questions. It points out the issues that you didn’t address in your study. The following questions should be discussed when addressing the limitations of your study.
- Could another method or means of collecting data been more effective?
- Could you have used a different research design?
- Did the sample represent your target population?
Ideally, these questions can help you define limitations in research. They also show how these constraints can affect the outcome of a study. Acknowledging the limitations of your study and being self-critical creates the impression that you know what your research couldn’t cover. What’s more, you ensure that peer reviewers don’t point them out.
Some research study limitations become clear to the audiences even before they start reading the paper. However, some limitations become apparent after a person has read the whole document. Nevertheless, you should present the limitations of your study in the discussion section. This is the last and most logical part of the paper to present the limitations.
In most cases, researchers include limitations at the beginning of this section after highlighting the strong side of their study methodology. Discussing the limitations of a research study before analyzing the findings helps the readers to understand how to apply or qualify the findings in their future research.
Here are examples of limitations in research that you can include in your paper:
- Limitations of the research design : Some constraints on the available procedures or population research can affect the results or outcomes obtained from a study.
- Impact limitations : Even when a study uses a strong design and gets excellent stats, it can be affected by other factors. For instance, the study can have a robust regional focus, be too specific to a population, or have a conductive field to incremental findings.
- Statistical or data limitations : In some cases, collecting enough data or getting sufficient study subjects becomes difficult. And this can under-power a study, thereby affecting the outcome. These limitations can even cause more issues when interpreting the findings.
- Financial resources : Maybe you needed additional software or some equipment to conduct your research. If you don’t get adequate funding, you might not acquire the equipment or software required to perform the study. And this can affect the outcome of your study.
Some limitations can relate to a researcher and they should also be shown to the readers. Also, suggest ways to decrease these limitations in future studies. Here are limitations in research examples that relate to the researcher:
- Limited information access : A study can involve some people and organizations that can hinder you from accessing relevant information. As such, you may have to rewrite or re-design your study. Nevertheless, explain what limited your access to information to your readers.
- Time limits : You most likely have a deadline for completing your study. But, time constraints can sometimes affect your study negatively. If this happens, acknowledge it and let your readers know. Also, suggest ways to deal with this limitation in future studies.
- Conflicts on personal issues and biased views : Some researchers have biased views due to personal opinions or cultural background. And this can affect the study. Additionally, a researcher with a biased view may opt to present data or results from only one side of the argument. To avoid this problem, be keen on the problem statement. Also, take your time to gather all relevant data, organize, and present it objectively.
Limitations of qualitative research can vary depending on the scope and topic of a study. However, these are the main limitations you’re likely to encounter when conducting your research and presenting your findings.
Now that you’ve known some of the limitations to research, you probably want to know how to organize and present them in your paper. Here are tips to help you with the organization:
- Identify your work restraints : Start by asking yourself, what limitations affected my study? What influence did they have on my conclusions? Your answers to these questions will give you a review of the limitations you faced and why they matter for your research.
- Describe your restraints : Provide a brief explanation of the limitations of research. Tell readers more about the constraints you encountered during research. Explain why these obstacles are important to your work. How did they affect your research? Don’t be afraid to discuss your study limitations. Always remember that no study lacks such obstacles since research can be perfect.
- Structure your study limitations : Start by listing all the limitations you encountered and then come up with a plan for presenting them. Think about the length of the limitations section in your paper. Come up with a draft to see how your limitations section will fit in your paper.
- Suggest ways to overcome the limitations in future studies : Tell your readers some of the mistakes that research can avoid in future studies. Also, explain how researchers can avoid these mistakes. Consider different perspectives that future studies can take when conducting future studies.
Always acknowledge the limitations of survey research before somebody else does. Don’t forget that flaws and problems can provide a chance for developing and continuing a study. That’s because you can come across a question without an answer. Answering such a question requires you to identify restraints experienced by the other researchers.
Mentioning limitations of correlational research, for instance, can show your critical analysis skills. That’s because you have to extensively study literature and experiments during the research. Highlighting observations and flaws of the study shows your understanding of the topic and related issues.
Perhaps, you have identified the limitations of your study but you don’t know how to present them in your paper. Whether you want to present the limitations of experimental research or survey, these tips will help you do it in an organized and better way.
- Use concise terms to describe every limitation but be detailed.
- Explain the cause of every limitation of your study.
- Explain why you could not overcome every limitation using your chosen method for gathering or acquiring information. You can also cite studies that had the same limitation, if possible.
- Assess the effect of every limitation concerning your overall findings or conclusions of the study.
- Describe how the limitations of your studies point to the importance of future studies.
Always remember that your chosen study method could be the cause of most limitations when interpreting the findings. For instance, you may have failed to interview a section of the population and then regret it later. If that’s the case with your study, don’t panic. Instead, acknowledge this limitation and explain how a different methodology can address the problem in future studies. You can contact experts from MyHomeworkDone , if you need professional help.
Highlighting the limitations of quantitative research, survey, experimental, or qualitative study shows the constraints you encountered and how they affected your findings. It also shows how researchers can overcome them in future studies. And most importantly, it shows that you’re transparent, honest, and unbiased.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.
Ukraine Live Updates https://war.ukraine.ua/
English Editing Research Services

How to Write about Research Limitations Without Reducing Your Impact

Being open about what you could not do in your research is actually extremely positive, and it’s viewed favorably by editors and peer reviewers. Writing about your limitations without reducing your impact is a valuable skills that will help your reputation as a researcher.
Areas you might have “failed,” in other words, your limitations, include:
- Aims and objectives (they were a bit too ambitious)
- Study design (not quite right)
- Supporting literature (you’re in uncharted territory)
- Sampling method (if only you’d snowballed it)
- Size of your study population (not enough power)
- Data collection method (bias found its way in)
- Confounding factors (didn’t see that coming!)
Your limitations don’t harm your work and reputation. Quite the opposite, they validate your work and increase your contribution to your field.
Limitations are quite easy to write about in a useful way that won’t reducing your impact. In fact, it’ll increase it.
Why are limitations so important?
Regrettably, the publish-or-perish mentality has created pressure to only come up with successful results. It’s also not too much to say that journals prefer positive studies – where the findings support the hypothesis.
But success alone is not science. Science is trial and error.
So it’s important to present a well-balanced, comprehensive description of your research. That includes your limitations. Accurately reporting your limitations will:
- Help prevent research waste on repeated failures
- Lead to creation of new hypotheses
- Provide useful information for systematic reviews
- Further demonstrate the robustness of your study
Adding clear discussion of any negative results and/or outcomes as well as your study limitations makes you much better able to provide your readers (including peer reviewers ) with:
- Information about your positive results
- Explanation of why your results are credible
- Ideas for future hypothesis generation
- Understanding of why your study has impact
These are good things. There’s even a journal for failure ! That’s how important it is in science.
Some authors find it hard to write about their study limitations, seeing it as an admission of failure. You can do it, and you don’t have to overdo it, either.
Know your limitations and you can anticipate and record them
Before you even start your study or collect your data, you’re often aware of certain limitations on what you want to test or what results you’ll get. These are three broad areas of limitations. But there are certainly more. We admit our own limitations here. 😉
Study design limitations
These might include the procedures, experiments, or reagents (or funding) you have available. As well as specific constraints on the study population. There may be ethical guidelines , and institutional or national policies, that limit what you can do.
These are very common limitations to medical research, for example. We refer to these kinds as study design limitations. Clinical trials, for instance, may have a restriction on interventions expected to have a positive effect. Or there may be restrictions on data collection based on the study population.
Impact limitations
Even if your study has a strong design and statistical foundation there might be a strong regional, national, or species-based focus. Or your work could be very population- or experimental-specific.
Your entire field of study, in fact, may only be conducive to incremental findings (e.g., particle physics or molecular biology).
These are inherent limits on impact in that they’re so specific. This limits the extendibility of the findings. It doesn’t however, limit the impact on a specific area or your field. Note the impact and push forward!
Statistical or data limitations
Perhaps the most common kind of limitation is statistical or data-based. This category is extremely common in experimental (e.g., chemistry) or field-based (e.g., ecology, population biology, qualitative clinical research) studies.
In many situations, testing hypotheses, you simply may not be able to collect as much data or as good quality data as you want to. Perhaps enrollment was more difficult than expected, under-powering your results.
Statistical limitations can also stem from study design, producing more serious issues in terms of interpreting findings. Seeking expert review from a statistician, such as by using Edanz scientific solutions , may be a good idea before starting your study design.

Other limitations
The above three are often interconnected. And they’re certainly not comprehensive.
As mentioned up top, you may also be limited by the literature. By external confounders. By things you didn’t even see coming (like how long it took you to find 10 qualified respondents for a qualitative study).
How to describe your limitations
Once you’ve identified possible limitations in your work, you need to get to the real point of this post – describing them in your manuscript.
Use the perspective of limitations = contribution and impact to maximize your chances of acceptance.
Reviewers, editors, and readers expect you to present your work authoritatively. You’re the expert in the field, after all. This may make them critical. Embrace that. Counter their possibly negative interpretation by explaining each limitation, showing why the results are still important and useful.
Where to write your limitations
Limitations are usually listed at the end of your Discussion section, though they can also be added throughout. Especially for a long manuscript or for an essay or dissertation, the latter may be useful for the reader.
Writing on your limitations: Words and structure
- This study did have some limitations.
- Three notable limitations affected this study.
- While this study successfully x, there were some limitations.
Giving a specific number is useful for the reader and can guide your writing. But if it’s a longer list, no need to number them. For a short list, you can write them as:
But this gets tiring for more than three limitations (bad RX: reader experience).
So, for longer lists, add a bit of variety in the language to engage the reader. Like this:
- The first issue was…
- Another limitation was…
- Additionally,…
An expert editor will be happy to help you make the English more natural and readable.
Structure for writing about a limitation
After your lead-in sentence, follow a pattern of writing on your findings and related limitation(s), giving a quick interpretation, back it with support (if needed), and offer the next steps.
This provides a complete package for the reader: what happened, what it means, why this is the case, and what is now needed.
In that way, you’ve admitted what may be lacking, but you’ve further established your authority. You’ve also provided a quick roadmap for your reader. That’s an impactful contribution!
Writing up a broader limitation
It might not always be logical or readable to give that much detail. As long as you fully describe and justify the limitation, you’ve done your job well.
Your study looked at a weight intervention over 6 months at primary healthcare clinics in Japan. The results were generally. But because you only looked at Japanese patients, these findings may not be extendible to patients of other cultures/nationalities, etc.
That’s not a failure at all. It’s a success. But it is a limitation. And other researchers can learn from it and build on it. Write it up in the limitations.
Finding: We found that, in the intervention group, BMI was reduced over 6 months.
Interpretation (and support): This suggests a regimen of routine testing and measurement followed by personalized health guidance from primary physicians had a positive effect on patients’ conditions.
Support: Yamazaki (2019) and Endo et al. (2020) found similar results in urban Japanese clinics and hospitals, respectively.
Limitation and how to use it: While these are useful findings, they are limited by only including Japanese populations. This does not ensure these interventions would be as effective in other nations or cultures. Similar interventions, adapted to the local healthcare and cultural conditions, would help to further clarify the methods.
Now you’ve stated the value of your finding, the limitation, and what to do with it. Nice impact!
Dealing with breakthroughs and niche-type limitations
Another hurdle you may hit is when your results are particularly novel or you’re publishing in a little-researched field. Those are limitations that need to be stated. In this case, you can support your findings by reinforcing the novelty of your results.
When breaking new ground, there are probably still many gaps in the knowledge base that need to be filled. A good follow-up statement for this type of limitation is to describe what, based on these results, the next steps would be to build a stronger overall evidence base.

Dealing with critical flaws
It’s possible that your study will have a fairly “critical” flaw (usually in the study design) that decreases confidence in your findings.
Other experts will likely notice this (in peer review or perhaps on a preprint server, they should notice it), so it’s best to explain why this error or flaw occurred.
You can still explain why the study is worth repeating or how you plan to retest the phenomenon. But you may need to temper your publication goals if you still plan to publish your work.
Curb your enthusiasm: Manage expectations
No one expects science to be perfect the first time and while your peers can be highly critical, no one’s work is beyond limitations. This is important to keep in mind.
Edanz experts can help by giving you an Expert Scientific Review and seeking out your limitations.
Our knowledge base is built on uncovering each piece of the puzzle, one at a time, and limitations show us where new efforts need to be made. Much like peer review , don’t think of limitations as being inherently bad, but more as an opportunity for a new challenge.
Ultimately, your limitations may be someone else’s inspirations. Include them in your submission when you get published in the journal of your choice .
All research faces problems: Being honest impresses people much more than ignoring your limitations.
Leave a Comment Cancel Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

How to write the ‘limitations or shortcomings of the study’ in a research paper?
‘Limitations or shortcomings of the study’ is the last stage of a thesis. After the study is completed, as a researcher, you may have identified shortcomings. Enlisting those areas in the thesis serves many purposes.
Identifying limitations or shortcomings in a study means that you have carefully considered their potential impact on your findings. So, when readers frame an opinion about your study, they know the conditions under which your findings are valid. Secondly, it establishes the credibility of your research. No study is complete without its set of limitations. Therefore identifying these limitations formally acknowledges that your research was carried out ethically. Finally, it establishes the validity of the research.
Researcher versus methodology
Researcher’s limitation occurs due to the researcher’s shortcomings. This may include sampling errors such as using a cluster random sampling instead of simple random sampling. Another type of it is the inability of the researcher to cover a wide range of respondents from a large geographical location. Another researcher based shortcoming is while conducting research that has poor literature support. The research may lack direction of the study, which leads to poor methodology implementation. On the other hand methodology, related limitations include poor methods of data collection.
For example, including fewer questions or irrelevant questions in the survey or interview questionnaire to collect data. In addition, methodological limitations also involve using wrong or irrelevant data analysis methods to present the findings or address the aim of the study. In this case, the limitation is an inadequate questionnaire for data collection to address the aim of the study.
Impact and data related shortcomings
Impact related shortcomings are those where the research suffers from poor impact by the causal factors that do not show a variation of the findings. This mainly occurs when you use manipulated data or have poorly planned the methodology. As a result, the findings may seem to be a too obvious or small positive or negative change in a variable quantity or function. On the other hand, data limitations are almost the same as methodological limitations mentioned in the previous type. Poor data collection methods and lack of large sample size for survey make for poor data.
Pre-research and post-research shortcomings
Pre-research shortcomings are the ones that you are aware of or expect during the conduction of the study. Usually, pre-research shortcomings are presented in the proposal or synopsis of the main research. However, there are no solutions to these problems. On the other hand, post-research limitations are the ones that are identified after the study was conducted. For instance, biased findings or contradictory findings comes under post-research limitations. This may also occur while conducting triangulation, and the findings of quantitative and qualitative do not match the secondary literature findings.
Steps to follow
There are many ways to write this section, but the three-step formula is popular.
Step 1: Announcement
In this step clearly mention the shortcomings that were faced in the study. List out all the shortcomings faced starting from methods to the statistical findings, such as bias in sampling, lack of respondent participation, etc. This section of the limitation should be only 10% of the total content.
Step 2: Reflection
In this step, justify and elaborate on the limitations. Justify why the limitations occurred. This should have the maximum content, of about 60%.
For instance, the biases of the responses may have occurred from poor knowledge of the participants or the participants were not aware of the importance of the study. Another possibility of biases of the responses is that they did not want to display the negative aspects and responded positively for the sake of the study. In addition, research limitation may also be possible as the study chose only one case for the collection of data.
Step 3: Look forward
This mainly comprises of the future scope of the study. Suggest what should be done in the future by researchers looking to conduct similar studies. This section should comprise the remaining 30% of the total content.
For instance, since, the study found the limitation of response biases; it is suggested that future researchers must choose more than one organization for distribution and collection of the survey or interview. In addition, a pilot study can be conducted well before the collection of final data.

What not to write?
- Do not apologize for writing the limitations of the study or never apologize for the occurrence of the limitations. Without it, the research is never complete, and the study will never move in the right direction.
- Avoid referring to personal limitations such as poor data collection due to lack of time. Do not mention points that will show negative impression your due diligence in the research. Avoid statements that will lead to the lack of your credibility. This may include statements such as ‘since the study was on secondary data gathered, many missing variables were discovered. Since the variables are important and cannot be ignored; there was a manipulation of the missing data’.
- Never mention shortcomings that have already been mentioned in the previous studies. Research is initiated by identifying the limitations of past research published in the same field. Do not use sentences like, ‘we found similar limitations as were mentioned by ABD, (2018) in the study ‘how to write limitations’? Or ‘the current study tried to avoid the limitations as mentioned in ABD, (2018), but the same still occurred.’
- Do not over-write or paraphrase just for the sake of filling up words. Never repeat the same points over and over again. For instance, once spoken of the sample size limitations, do not write that, ‘the study also saw the limitation of less number of people turning up for the survey questionnaire fill-ins.’
Sample of ‘limitations of the study’
The following is a classic example of how to write the limitations in a thesis.
The main aim of the study was to assess the factors that lead to poor limitations writing in a research paper by research scholars. Although the study conducted a thorough survey, there were certain limitations while exploring the aim of the study. It is expected that these points will help future researchers to avoid facing the same shortcomings.
- While conducting the pilot study it was expected that the number of participants will be a minimum of 200. However, after the final data collection and compilation of data, there were only 129 participants for the study. This might be from the fact that the participants were not interested in participating or did not have the time to completely fill in the questionnaire. Since the sample populations were mainly research scholars from a tertiary institute, maybe they did not have enough time to fill in the questionnaires. Therefore, in future studies that use research scholars as a sample population but consider providing questionnaires or collect data from a much larger group or choose more than one institutions for the collection of data.
- It was found from the study that, the current findings contradict the findings of previous studies on factors that lead to poor limitations writing in a research paper by research scholars. This may be from the fact that the studies conducted previously were based on European countries and America. Therefore, the perspective of the research scholars may have varied. Again, the methods of research differ from one place to another and the challenges faced by researchers also differ. This may have led to the limitation of contradictory findings. Therefore, it is suggested that the researchers must consider the factors found from different regions and assess them or make a comparative study to find the factors and how they differ.
Concluding note
Limitations of the study is a very important part of the research. It helps future studies and researches to focus on more innovative ways to conduct research and ignore the issues faced. Be honest, pragmatic and structured while writing this section. Go through ample examples from different authors before writing your own. I suggest you using pointers to specifically write or inform the limitations as indicated in the limitation example. Be specific about the limitations and try not to make up to the limitations.
- Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
- Click to print (Opens in new window)
Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
3 thoughts on “How to write the ‘limitations or shortcomings of the study’ in a research paper?”
Research paper, proofreading.
Our Anniversary Party ends in
What are the limitations in research and how to write them?
Learn about the potential limitations in research and how to appropriately address them in order to deliver honest and ethical research.
It is fairly uncommon for researchers to stumble into the term research limitations when working on their research paper. Limitations in research can arise owing to constraints on design, methods, materials, and so on, and these aspects, unfortunately, may have an influence on your subject’s findings.
In this Mind The Graph’s article, we’ll discuss some recommendations for writing limitations in research , provide examples of various common types of limitations, and suggest how to properly present this information.
What are the limitations in research?
The limitations in research are the constraints in design, methods or even researchers’ limitations that affect and influence the interpretation of your research’s ultimate findings. These are limitations on the generalization and usability of findings that emerge from the design of the research and/or the method employed to ensure validity both internally and externally.
Researchers are usually cautious to acknowledge the limitations of their research in their publications for fear of undermining the research’s scientific validity. No research is faultless or covers every possible angle. As a result, addressing the constraints of your research exhibits honesty and integrity .
Why should you include limitations of research in my paper?
Though limitations tackle potential flaws in research, commenting on them at the conclusion of your paper, by demonstrating that you are aware of these limitations and explaining how they impact the conclusions that may be taken from the research, improves your research by disclosing any issues before other researchers or reviewers do .
Additionally, emphasizing research constraints implies that you have thoroughly investigated the ramifications of research shortcomings and have a thorough understanding of your research problem.
Limits exist in any research; being honest about them and explaining them would impress researchers and reviewers more than disregarding them.
Remember that acknowledging a research’s shortcomings offers a chance to provide ideas for future research, but be careful to describe how your study may help to concentrate on these outstanding problems.
Possible limitations examples
Here are some limitations connected to methodology and the research procedure that you may need to explain and discuss in connection to your findings.
Methodological limitations
Sample size.
The number of units of analysis used in your study is determined by the sort of research issue being investigated. It is important to note that if your sample is too small, finding significant connections in the data will be challenging, as statistical tests typically require a larger sample size to ensure a fair representation and this can be limiting.
Lack of available or reliable data
A lack of data or trustworthy data will almost certainly necessitate limiting the scope of your research or the size of your sample, or it can be a substantial impediment to identifying a pattern and a relevant connection.
Lack of prior research on the subject
Citing previous research papers forms the basis of your literature review and aids in comprehending the research subject you are researching. Yet there may be little if any, past research on your issue.
The measure used to collect data
After finishing your analysis of the findings, you realize that the method you used to collect data limited your capacity to undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the findings. Recognize the flaw by mentioning that future researchers should change the specific approach for data collection.
Issues with research samples and selection
Sampling inaccuracies arise when a probability sampling method is employed to choose a sample, but that sample does not accurately represent the overall population or the relevant group. As a result, your study suffers from “sampling bias” or “selection bias.”
Limitations of the research
When your research requires polling certain persons or a specific group, you may have encountered the issue of limited access to these interviewees. Because of the limited access, you may need to reorganize or rearrange your research. In this scenario, explain why access is restricted and ensure that your findings are still trustworthy and valid despite the constraint.
Time constraints
Practical difficulties may limit the amount of time available to explore a research issue and monitor changes as they occur. If time restrictions have any detrimental influence on your research, recognize this impact by expressing the necessity for a future investigation.
Due to their cultural origins or opinions on observed events, researchers may carry biased opinions, which can influence the credibility of a research. Furthermore, researchers may exhibit biases toward data and conclusions that only support their hypotheses or arguments.
The structure of limitations section
The limitations of your research are usually stated at the beginning of the discussion section of your paper so that the reader is aware of and comprehends the limitations prior to actually reading the rest of your findings, or they are stated at the end of the discussion section as an acknowledgement of the need for further research.
The ideal way is to divide your limitations section into three steps:
1. Identify the research constraints;
2. Describe in great detail how they affect your research;
3. Mention the opportunity for future investigations and give possibilities.
By following this method while addressing the constraints of your research, you will be able to effectively highlight your research’s shortcomings without jeopardizing the quality and integrity of your research.
Present your research or paper in an innovative way
If you want your readers to be engaged and participate in your research, try Mind The Graph tool to add visual assets to your content. Infographics may improve comprehension and are easy to read, just as the Mind The Graph tool is simple to use and offers a variety of templates from which you can select the one that best suits your information.
Related Articles

Subscribe to our newsletter
Exclusive high quality content about effective visual communication in science.
- Exclusive Guide
- design tips, - scientific news and trends, - tutorials and templates.

340 USD in benefits for orly 99 USD
About Jessica Abbadia
Jessica Abbadia is a lawyer that has been working in Digital Marketing since 2020, improving organic performance for apps and websites in various regions through ASO and SEO. Currently developing scientific and intellectual knowledge for the community's benefit. Jessica is an animal rights activist who enjoys reading and drinking strong coffee.
Content tags

- USC Libraries
- Research Guides
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper
- Limitations of the Study
- Purpose of Guide
- Design Flaws to Avoid
- Independent and Dependent Variables
- Glossary of Research Terms
- Reading Research Effectively
- Narrowing a Topic Idea
- Broadening a Topic Idea
- Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
- Academic Writing Style
- Choosing a Title
- Making an Outline
- Paragraph Development
- Research Process Video Series
- Executive Summary
- The C.A.R.S. Model
- Background Information
- The Research Problem/Question
- Theoretical Framework
- Citation Tracking
- Content Alert Services
- Evaluating Sources
- Primary Sources
- Secondary Sources
- Tiertiary Sources
- Scholarly vs. Popular Publications
- Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative Methods
- Insiderness
- Using Non-Textual Elements
- Common Grammar Mistakes
- Writing Concisely
- Avoiding Plagiarism
- Footnotes or Endnotes?
- Further Readings
- Bibliography
The limitations of the study are those characteristics of design or methodology that impacted or influenced the interpretation of the findings from your research. Study limitations are the constraints placed on the ability to generalize from the results, to further describe applications to practice, and/or related to the utility of findings that are the result of the ways in which you initially chose to design the study or the method used to establish internal and external validity or the result of unanticipated challenges that emerged during the study.
Price, James H. and Judy Murnan. “Research Limitations and the Necessity of Reporting Them.” American Journal of Health Education 35 (2004): 66-67; Theofanidis, Dimitrios and Antigoni Fountouki. "Limitations and Delimitations in the Research Process." Perioperative Nursing 7 (September-December 2018): 155-163. .
Importance of...
Always acknowledge a study's limitations. It is far better that you identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor and have your grade lowered because you appeared to have ignored them.
Keep in mind that acknowledgment of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research. If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.
Acknowledgment of a study's limitations also provides you with opportunities to demonstrate that you have thought critically about the research problem, understood the relevant literature published about it, and correctly assessed the methods chosen for studying the problem. A key objective of the research process is not only discovering new knowledge but also to confront assumptions and explore what we don't know.
Claiming limitations is a subjective process because you must evaluate the impact of those limitations . Don't just list key weaknesses and the magnitude of a study's limitations. To do so diminishes the validity of your research because it leaves the reader wondering whether, or in what ways, limitation(s) in your study may have impacted the results and conclusions. Limitations require a critical, overall appraisal and interpretation of their impact. You should answer the question: do these problems with errors, methods, validity, etc. eventually matter and, if so, to what extent?
Price, James H. and Judy Murnan. “Research Limitations and the Necessity of Reporting Them.” American Journal of Health Education 35 (2004): 66-67; Structure: How to Structure the Research Limitations Section of Your Dissertation. Dissertations and Theses: An Online Textbook. Laerd.com.
Descriptions of Possible Limitations
All studies have limitations . However, it is important that you restrict your discussion to limitations related to the research problem under investigation. For example, if a meta-analysis of existing literature is not a stated purpose of your research, it should not be discussed as a limitation. Do not apologize for not addressing issues that you did not promise to investigate in the introduction of your paper.
Here are examples of limitations related to methodology and the research process you may need to describe and discuss how they possibly impacted your results. Note that descriptions of limitations should be stated in the past tense because they were discovered after you completed your research.
Possible Methodological Limitations
- Sample size -- the number of the units of analysis you use in your study is dictated by the type of research problem you are investigating. Note that, if your sample size is too small, it will be difficult to find significant relationships from the data, as statistical tests normally require a larger sample size to ensure a representative distribution of the population and to be considered representative of groups of people to whom results will be generalized or transferred. Note that sample size is generally less relevant in qualitative research if explained in the context of the research problem.
- Lack of available and/or reliable data -- a lack of data or of reliable data will likely require you to limit the scope of your analysis, the size of your sample, or it can be a significant obstacle in finding a trend and a meaningful relationship. You need to not only describe these limitations but provide cogent reasons why you believe data is missing or is unreliable. However, don’t just throw up your hands in frustration; use this as an opportunity to describe a need for future research based on designing a different method for gathering data.
- Lack of prior research studies on the topic -- citing prior research studies forms the basis of your literature review and helps lay a foundation for understanding the research problem you are investigating. Depending on the currency or scope of your research topic, there may be little, if any, prior research on your topic. Before assuming this to be true, though, consult with a librarian! In cases when a librarian has confirmed that there is little or no prior research, you may be required to develop an entirely new research typology [for example, using an exploratory rather than an explanatory research design ]. Note again that discovering a limitation can serve as an important opportunity to identify new gaps in the literature and to describe the need for further research.
- Measure used to collect the data -- sometimes it is the case that, after completing your interpretation of the findings, you discover that the way in which you gathered data inhibited your ability to conduct a thorough analysis of the results. For example, you regret not including a specific question in a survey that, in retrospect, could have helped address a particular issue that emerged later in the study. Acknowledge the deficiency by stating a need for future researchers to revise the specific method for gathering data.
- Self-reported data -- whether you are relying on pre-existing data or you are conducting a qualitative research study and gathering the data yourself, self-reported data is limited by the fact that it rarely can be independently verified. In other words, you have to the accuracy of what people say, whether in interviews, focus groups, or on questionnaires, at face value. However, self-reported data can contain several potential sources of bias that you should be alert to and note as limitations. These biases become apparent if they are incongruent with data from other sources. These are: (1) selective memory [remembering or not remembering experiences or events that occurred at some point in the past]; (2) telescoping [recalling events that occurred at one time as if they occurred at another time]; (3) attribution [the act of attributing positive events and outcomes to one's own agency, but attributing negative events and outcomes to external forces]; and, (4) exaggeration [the act of representing outcomes or embellishing events as more significant than is actually suggested from other data].
Possible Limitations of the Researcher
- Access -- if your study depends on having access to people, organizations, data, or documents and, for whatever reason, access is denied or limited in some way, the reasons for this needs to be described. Also, include an explanation why being denied or limited access did not prevent you from following through on your study.
- Longitudinal effects -- unlike your professor, who can literally devote years [even a lifetime] to studying a single topic, the time available to investigate a research problem and to measure change or stability over time is constrained by the due date of your assignment. Be sure to choose a research problem that does not require an excessive amount of time to complete the literature review, apply the methodology, and gather and interpret the results. If you're unsure whether you can complete your research within the confines of the assignment's due date, talk to your professor.
- Cultural and other type of bias -- we all have biases, whether we are conscience of them or not. Bias is when a person, place, event, or thing is viewed or shown in a consistently inaccurate way. Bias is usually negative, though one can have a positive bias as well, especially if that bias reflects your reliance on research that only support your hypothesis. When proof-reading your paper, be especially critical in reviewing how you have stated a problem, selected the data to be studied, what may have been omitted, the manner in which you have ordered events, people, or places, how you have chosen to represent a person, place, or thing, to name a phenomenon, or to use possible words with a positive or negative connotation. NOTE: If you detect bias in prior research, it must be acknowledged and you should explain what measures were taken to avoid perpetuating that bias. For example, if a previous study only used boys to examine how music education supports effective math skills, describe how your research expands the study to include girls.
- Fluency in a language -- if your research focuses , for example, on measuring the perceived value of after-school tutoring among Mexican-American ESL [English as a Second Language] students and you are not fluent in Spanish, you are limited in being able to read and interpret Spanish language research studies on the topic or to speak with these students in their primary language. This deficiency should be acknowledged.
Aguinis, Hermam and Jeffrey R. Edwards. “Methodological Wishes for the Next Decade and How to Make Wishes Come True.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (January 2014): 143-174; Brutus, Stéphane et al. "Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports: Analysis and Recommendations." Journal of Management 39 (January 2013): 48-75; Senunyeme, Emmanuel K. Business Research Methods. Powerpoint Presentation. Regent University of Science and Technology; ter Riet, Gerben et al. “All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies.” PLOS One 8 (November 2013): 1-6.
Structure and Writing Style
Information about the limitations of your study are generally placed either at the beginning of the discussion section of your paper so the reader knows and understands the limitations before reading the rest of your analysis of the findings, or, the limitations are outlined at the conclusion of the discussion section as an acknowledgement of the need for further study. Statements about a study's limitations should not be buried in the body [middle] of the discussion section unless a limitation is specific to something covered in that part of the paper. If this is the case, though, the limitation should be reiterated at the conclusion of the section.
If you determine that your study is seriously flawed due to important limitations , such as, an inability to acquire critical data, consider reframing it as an exploratory study intended to lay the groundwork for a more complete research study in the future. Be sure, though, to specifically explain the ways that these flaws can be successfully overcome in a new study.
But, do not use this as an excuse for not developing a thorough research paper! Review the tab in this guide for developing a research topic . If serious limitations exist, it generally indicates a likelihood that your research problem is too narrowly defined or that the issue or event under study is too recent and, thus, very little research has been written about it. If serious limitations do emerge, consult with your professor about possible ways to overcome them or how to revise your study.
When discussing the limitations of your research, be sure to:
- Describe each limitation in detailed but concise terms;
- Explain why each limitation exists;
- Provide the reasons why each limitation could not be overcome using the method(s) chosen to acquire or gather the data [cite to other studies that had similar problems when possible];
- Assess the impact of each limitation in relation to the overall findings and conclusions of your study; and,
- If appropriate, describe how these limitations could point to the need for further research.
Remember that the method you chose may be the source of a significant limitation that has emerged during your interpretation of the results [for example, you didn't interview a group of people that you later wish you had]. If this is the case, don't panic. Acknowledge it, and explain how applying a different or more robust methodology might address the research problem more effectively in a future study. A underlying goal of scholarly research is not only to show what works, but to demonstrate what doesn't work or what needs further clarification.
Aguinis, Hermam and Jeffrey R. Edwards. “Methodological Wishes for the Next Decade and How to Make Wishes Come True.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (January 2014): 143-174; Brutus, Stéphane et al. "Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports: Analysis and Recommendations." Journal of Management 39 (January 2013): 48-75; Ioannidis, John P.A. "Limitations are not Properly Acknowledged in the Scientific Literature." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (2007): 324-329; Pasek, Josh. Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed. January 24, 2012. Academia.edu; Structure: How to Structure the Research Limitations Section of Your Dissertation. Dissertations and Theses: An Online Textbook. Laerd.com; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University.
Writing Tip
Don't Inflate the Importance of Your Findings!
After all the hard work and long hours devoted to writing your research paper, it is easy to get carried away with attributing unwarranted importance to what you’ve done. We all want our academic work to be viewed as excellent and worthy of a good grade, but it is important that you understand and openly acknowledge the limitations of your study. Inflating the importance of your study's findings could be perceived by your readers as an attempt hide its flaws or encourage a biased interpretation of the results. A small measure of humility goes a long way!
Another Writing Tip
Negative Results are Not a Limitation!
Negative evidence refers to findings that unexpectedly challenge rather than support your hypothesis. If you didn't get the results you anticipated, it may mean your hypothesis was incorrect and needs to be reformulated. Or, perhaps you have stumbled onto something unexpected that warrants further study. Moreover, the absence of an effect may be very telling in many situations, particularly in experimental research designs. In any case, your results may very well be of importance to others even though they did not support your hypothesis. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that results contrary to what you expected is a limitation to your study. If you carried out the research well, they are simply your results and only require additional interpretation.
Lewis, George H. and Jonathan F. Lewis. “The Dog in the Night-Time: Negative Evidence in Social Research.” The British Journal of Sociology 31 (December 1980): 544-558.
Yet Another Writing Tip
Sample Size Limitations in Qualitative Research
Sample sizes are typically smaller in qualitative research because, as the study goes on, acquiring more data does not necessarily lead to more information. This is because one occurrence of a piece of data, or a code, is all that is necessary to ensure that it becomes part of the analysis framework. However, it remains true that sample sizes that are too small cannot adequately support claims of having achieved valid conclusions and sample sizes that are too large do not permit the deep, naturalistic, and inductive analysis that defines qualitative inquiry. Determining adequate sample size in qualitative research is ultimately a matter of judgment and experience in evaluating the quality of the information collected against the uses to which it will be applied and the particular research method and purposeful sampling strategy employed. If the sample size is found to be a limitation, it may reflect your judgment about the methodological technique chosen [e.g., single life history study versus focus group interviews] rather than the number of respondents used.
Boddy, Clive Roland. "Sample Size for Qualitative Research." Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 19 (2016): 426-432; Huberman, A. Michael and Matthew B. Miles. "Data Management and Analysis Methods." In Handbook of Qualitative Research . Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), pp. 428-444; Blaikie, Norman. "Confounding Issues Related to Determining Sample Size in Qualitative Research." International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (2018): 635-641; Oppong, Steward Harrison. "The Problem of Sampling in qualitative Research." Asian Journal of Management Sciences and Education 2 (2013): 202-210.
- << Previous: 8. The Discussion
- Next: 9. The Conclusion >>
- Last Updated: Feb 16, 2023 1:36 PM
- URL: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide

Organizing Academic Research Papers: Limitations of the Study
- Purpose of Guide
- Design Flaws to Avoid
- Glossary of Research Terms
- Narrowing a Topic Idea
- Broadening a Topic Idea
- Extending the Timeliness of a Topic Idea
- Academic Writing Style
- Choosing a Title
- Making an Outline
- Paragraph Development
- Executive Summary
- Background Information
- The Research Problem/Question
- Theoretical Framework
- Citation Tracking
- Content Alert Services
- Evaluating Sources
- Primary Sources
- Secondary Sources
- Tertiary Sources
- What Is Scholarly vs. Popular?
- Qualitative Methods
- Quantitative Methods
- Using Non-Textual Elements
- Limitations of the Study
- Common Grammar Mistakes
- Avoiding Plagiarism
- Footnotes or Endnotes?
- Further Readings
- Annotated Bibliography
- Dealing with Nervousness
- Using Visual Aids
- Grading Someone Else's Paper
- How to Manage Group Projects
- Multiple Book Review Essay
- Reviewing Collected Essays
- About Informed Consent
- Writing Field Notes
- Writing a Policy Memo
- Writing a Research Proposal
- Acknowledgements
The limitations of the study are those characteristics of design or methodology that impacted or influenced the application or interpretation of the results of your study. They are the constraints on generalizability and utility of findings that are the result of the ways in which you chose to design the study and/or the method used to establish internal and external validity.
Importance of...
Always acknowledge a study's limitations. It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor and be graded down because you appear to have ignored them.
Keep in mind that acknowledgement of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research. If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study.
Acknowledgement of a study's limitations also provides you with an opportunity to demonstrate to your professor that you have thought critically about the research problem, understood the relevant literature published about it, and correctly assessed the methods chosen for studying the problem. A key objective of the research process is not only discovering new knowledge but also to confront assumptions and explore what we don't know.
Claiming limitiations is a subjective process because you must evaluate the impact of those limitations . Don't just list key weaknesses and the magnitude of a study's limitations. To do so diminishes the validity of your research because it leaves the reader wondering whether, or in what ways, limitation(s) in your study may have impacted the findings and conclusions. Limitations require a critical, overall appraisal and interpretation of their impact. You should answer the question: do these problems with errors, methods, validity, etc. eventually matter and, if so, to what extent?
Structure: How to Structure the Research Limitations Section of Your Dissertation . Dissertations and Theses: An Online Textbook. Laerd.com.
Descriptions of Possible Limitations
All studies have limitations . However, it is important that you restrict your discussion to limitations related to the research problem under investigation. For example, if a meta-analysis of existing literature is not a stated purpose of your research, it should not be discussed as a limitation. Do not apologize for not addressing issues that you did not promise to investigate in your paper.
Here are examples of limitations you may need to describe and to discuss how they possibly impacted your findings. Descriptions of limitations should be stated in the past tense.
Possible Methodological Limitations
- Sample size -- the number of the units of analysis you use in your study is dictated by the type of research problem you are investigating. Note that, if your sample size is too small, it will be difficult to find significant relationships from the data, as statistical tests normally require a larger sample size to ensure a representative distribution of the population and to be considered representative of groups of people to whom results will be generalized or transferred.
- Lack of available and/or reliable data -- a lack of data or of reliable data will likely require you to limit the scope of your analysis, the size of your sample, or it can be a significant obstacle in finding a trend and a meaningful relationship. You need to not only describe these limitations but to offer reasons why you believe data is missing or is unreliable. However, don’t just throw up your hands in frustration; use this as an opportunity to describe the need for future research.
- Lack of prior research studies on the topic -- citing prior research studies forms the basis of your literature review and helps lay a foundation for understanding the research problem you are investigating. Depending on the currency or scope of your research topic, there may be little, if any, prior research on your topic. Before assuming this to be true, consult with a librarian! In cases when a librarian has confirmed that there is a lack of prior research, you may be required to develop an entirely new research typology [for example, using an exploratory rather than an explanatory research design]. Note that this limitation can serve as an important opportunity to describe the need for further research.
- Measure used to collect the data -- sometimes it is the case that, after completing your interpretation of the findings, you discover that the way in which you gathered data inhibited your ability to conduct a thorough analysis of the results. For example, you regret not including a specific question in a survey that, in retrospect, could have helped address a particular issue that emerged later in the study. Acknowledge the deficiency by stating a need in future research to revise the specific method for gathering data.
- Self-reported data -- whether you are relying on pre-existing self-reported data or you are conducting a qualitative research study and gathering the data yourself, self-reported data is limited by the fact that it rarely can be independently verified. In other words, you have to take what people say, whether in interviews, focus groups, or on questionnaires, at face value. However, self-reported data contain several potential sources of bias that should be noted as limitations: (1) selective memory (remembering or not remembering experiences or events that occurred at some point in the past); (2) telescoping [recalling events that occurred at one time as if they occurred at another time]; (3) attribution [the act of attributing positive events and outcomes to one's own agency but attributing negative events and outcomes to external forces]; and, (4) exaggeration [the act of representing outcomes or embellishing events as more significant than is actually suggested from other data].
Possible Limitations of the Researcher
- Access -- if your study depends on having access to people, organizations, or documents and, for whatever reason, access is denied or otherwise limited, the reasons for this need to be described.
- Longitudinal effects -- unlike your professor, who can literally devote years [even a lifetime] to studying a single research problem, the time available to investigate a research problem and to measure change or stability within a sample is constrained by the due date of your assignment. Be sure to choose a topic that does not require an excessive amount of time to complete the literature review, apply the methodology, and gather and interpret the results. If you're unsure, talk to your professor.
- Cultural and other type of bias -- we all have biases, whether we are conscience of them or not. Bias is when a person, place, or thing is viewed or shown in a consistently inaccurate way. It is usually negative, though one can have a positive bias as well. When proof-reading your paper, be especially critical in reviewing how you have stated a problem, selected the data to be studied, what may have been omitted, the manner in which you have ordered events, people, or places and how you have chosen to represent a person, place, or thing, to name a phenomenon, or to use possible words with a positive or negative connotation. Note that if you detect bias in prior research, it must be acknowledged and you should explain what measures were taken to avoid perpetuating bias.
- Fluency in a language -- if your research focuses on measuring the perceived value of after-school tutoring among Mexican-American ESL [English as a Second Language] students, for example, and you are not fluent in Spanish, you are limited in being able to read and interpret Spanish language research studies on the topic. This deficiency should be acknowledged.
Brutus, Stéphane et al. Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports: Analysis and Recommendations. Journal of Management 39 (January 2013): 48-75; Senunyeme, Emmanuel K. Business Research Methods . Powerpoint Presentation. Regent University of Science and Technology.
Structure and Writing Style
Information about the limitations of your study are generally placed either at the beginning of the discussion section of your paper so the reader knows and understands the limitations before reading the rest of your analysis of the findings, or, the limitations are outlined at the conclusion of the discussion section as an acknowledgement of the need for further study. Statements about a study's limitations should not be buried in the body [middle] of the discussion section unless a limitation is specific to something covered in that part of the paper. If this is the case, though, the limitation should be reiterated at the conclusion of the section.
If you determine that your study is seriously flawed due to important limitations , such as, an inability to acquire critical data, consider reframing it as a pilot study intended to lay the groundwork for a more complete research study in the future. Be sure, though, to specifically explain the ways that these flaws can be successfully overcome in later studies.
But, do not use this as an excuse for not developing a thorough research paper! Review the tab in this guide for developing a research topic . If serious limitations exist, it generally indicates a likelihood that your research problem is too narrowly defined or that the issue or event under study is too recent and, thus, very little research has been written about it. If serious limitations do emerge, consult with your professor about possible ways to overcome them or how to reframe your study.
When discussing the limitations of your research, be sure to:
- Describe each limitation in detailed but concise terms;
- Explain why each limitation exists;
- Provide the reasons why each limitation could not be overcome using the method(s) chosen to gather the data [cite to other studies that had similar problems when possible];
- Assess the impact of each limitation in relation to the overall findings and conclusions of your study; and,
- If appropriate, describe how these limitations could point to the need for further research.
Remember that the method you chose may be the source of a significant limitation that has emerged during your interpretation of the results [for example, you didn't ask a particular question in a survey that you later wish you had]. If this is the case, don't panic. Acknowledge it, and explain how applying a different or more robust methodology might address the research problem more effectively in any future study. A underlying goal of scholarly research is not only to prove what works, but to demonstrate what doesn't work or what needs further clarification.
Brutus, Stéphane et al. Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports: Analysis and Recommendations. Journal of Management 39 (January 2013): 48-75; Ioannidis, John P.A. Limitations are not Properly Acknowledged in the Scientific Literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (2007): 324-329; Pasek, Josh. Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed . January 24, 2012. Academia.edu; Structure: How to Structure the Research Limitations Section of Your Dissertation . Dissertations and Theses: An Online Textbook. Laerd.com; What Is an Academic Paper? Institute for Writing Rhetoric. Dartmouth College; Writing the Experimental Report: Methods, Results, and Discussion. The Writing Lab and The OWL. Purdue University.
Writing Tip
Don't Inflate the Importance of Your Findings! After all the hard work and long hours devoted to writing your research paper, it is easy to get carried away with attributing unwarranted importance to what you’ve done. We all want our academic work to be viewed as excellent and worthy of a good grade, but it is important that you understand and openly acknowledge the limitiations of your study. Inflating of the importance of your study's findings in an attempt hide its flaws is a big turn off to your readers. A measure of humility goes a long way!
Another Writing Tip
Negative Results are Not a Limitation!
Negative evidence refers to findings that unexpectedly challenge rather than support your hypothesis. If you didn't get the results you anticipated, it may mean your hypothesis was incorrect and needs to be reformulated, or, perhaps you have stumbled onto something unexpected that warrants further study. Moreover, the absence of an effect may be very telling in many situations, particularly in experimental research designs. In any case, your results may be of importance to others even though they did not support your hypothesis. Do not fall into the trap of thinking that results contrary to what you expected is a limitation to your study. If you carried out the research well, they are simply your results and only require additional interpretation.
Yet Another Writing Tip
A Note about Sample Size Limitations in Qualitative Research
Sample sizes are typically smaller in qualitative research because, as the study goes on, acquiring more data does not necessarily lead to more information. This is because one occurrence of a piece of data, or a code, is all that is necessary to ensure that it becomes part of the analysis framework. However, it remains true that sample sizes that are too small cannot adequately support claims of having achieved valid conclusions and sample sizes that are too large do not permit the deep, naturalistic, and inductive analysis that defines qualitative inquiry. Determining adequate sample size in qualitative research is ultimately a matter of judgment and experience in evaluating the quality of the information collected against the uses to which it will be applied and the particular research method and purposeful sampling strategy employed. If the sample size is found to be a limitation, it may reflect your judgement about the methodological technique chosen [e.g., single life history study versus focus group interviews] rather than the number of respondents used.
Huberman, A. Michael and Matthew B. Miles. Data Management and Analysis Methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), pp. 428-444.
- << Previous: 8. The Discussion
- Next: 9. The Conclusion >>
- Last Updated: Dec 8, 2022 2:24 PM
- URL: https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803
- QuickSearch
- Library Catalog
- Databases A-Z
- Publication Finder
- Course Reserves
- Citation Linker
- Digital Commons
Research Support
- Ask a Librarian
- Appointments
- Interlibrary Loan (ILL)
- Research Guides
- Databases by Subject
- Citation Help
Using the Library
- Reserve a Group Study Room
- Renew Books
- Honors Study Rooms
- Off-Campus Access
- Library Policies
- Library Technology
User Information
- Grad Students
- Online Students
- COVID-19 Updates
- Staff Directory
- News & Announcements
- Library Newsletter
My Accounts
- Interlibrary Loan
- Staff Site Login

FIND US ON
- Affiliate Program

- UNITED STATES
- 台灣 (TAIWAN)
- TÜRKIYE (TURKEY)

Academic Editing Services
- - Research Paper
- - Journal Manuscript
- - Dissertation
- - College & University Assignments
Admissions Editing Services
- - Application Essay
- - Personal Statement
- - Recommendation Letter
- - Cover Letter
- - CV/Resume
Business Editing Services
- - Business Documents
- - Report & Brochure
- - Website & Blog
Writer Editing Services
- - Script & Screenplay
Our Editors
Client reviews.
- Editing & Proofreading Prices
- Wordvice Points
- Partner Discount
- Plagiarism Checker
APA Citation Generator
MLA Citation Generator
Chicago Citation Generator
Vancouver Citation Generator
- - APA Style
- - MLA Style
- - Chicago Style
- - Vancouver Style
- Writing & Editing Guide
- Academic Resources
- Admissions Resources
How to Present the Limitations of the Study Examples
What are the limitations of a study?
The limitations of a study are its flaws or shortcomings. Study limitations can exist due to constraints on research design, methodology, materials, etc., and these factors may impact the findings of your study. However, researchers are often reluctant to discuss the limitations of their study in their papers, feeling that bringing up limitations may undermine its research value in the eyes of readers and reviewers.
In spite of the impact it might have (and perhaps because of it) you should clearly acknowledge any limitations in your research paper in order to show readers—whether journal editors, other researchers, or the general public—that you are aware of these limitations and to explain how they affect the conclusions that can be drawn from the research.
In this article, we provide some guidelines for writing about research limitations, show examples of some frequently seen study limitations, and recommend techniques for presenting this information. And after you have finished drafting and have received manuscript editing for your work, you still might want to follow this up with academic editing before submitting your work to your target journal.
Why do I need to include limitations of research in my paper?
Although limitations address the potential weaknesses of a study, writing about them toward the end of your paper actually strengthens your study by identifying any problems before other researchers or reviewers find them.
Furthermore, pointing out study limitations shows that you’ve considered the impact of research weakness thoroughly and have an in-depth understanding of your research topic. Since all studies face limitations, being honest and detailing these limitations will impress researchers and reviewers more than ignoring them.

Where should I put the limitations of the study in my paper?
Some limitations might be evident to researchers before the start of the study, while others might become clear while you are conducting the research. Whether these limitations are anticipated or not, and whether they are due to research design or to methodology, they should be clearly identified and discussed in the discussion section —the final section of your paper. Most journals now require you to include a discussion of potential limitations of your work, and many journals now ask you to place this “limitations section” at the very end of your article.
Some journals ask you to also discuss the strengths of your work in this section, and some allow you to freely choose where to include that information in your discussion section—make sure to always check the author instructions of your target journal before you finalize a manuscript and submit it for peer review .
Limitations of the Study Examples
There are several reasons why limitations of research might exist. The two main categories of limitations are those that result from the methodology and those that result from issues with the researcher(s).
Common Methodological Limitations of Studies
Limitations of research due to methodological problems can be addressed by clearly and directly identifying the potential problem and suggesting ways in which this could have been addressed—and SHOULD be addressed in future studies. The following are some major potential methodological issues that can impact the conclusions researchers can draw from the research.
Issues with research samples and selection
Sampling errors occur when a probability sampling method is used to select a sample, but that sample does not reflect the general population or appropriate population concerned. This results in limitations of your study known as “sample bias” or “selection bias.”
For example, if you conducted a survey to obtain your research results, your samples (participants) were asked to respond to the survey questions. However, you might have had limited ability to gain access to the appropriate type or geographic scope of participants. In this case, the people who responded to your survey questions may not truly be a random sample.
Insufficient sample size for statistical measurements
When conducting a study, it is important to have a sufficient sample size in order to draw valid conclusions. The larger the sample, the more precise your results will be. If your sample size is too small, it will be difficult to identify significant relationships in the data.
Normally, statistical tests require a larger sample size to ensure that the sample is considered representative of a population and that the statistical result can be generalized to a larger population. It is a good idea to understand how to choose an appropriate sample size before you conduct your research by using scientific calculation tools—in fact, many journals now require such estimation to be included in every manuscript that is sent out for review.
Lack of previous research studies on the topic
Citing and referencing prior research studies constitutes the basis of the literature review for your thesis or study, and these prior studies provide the theoretical foundations for the research question you are investigating. However, depending on the scope of your research topic, prior research studies that are relevant to your thesis might be limited.
When there is very little or no prior research on a specific topic, you may need to develop an entirely new research typology. In this case, discovering a limitation can be considered an important opportunity to identify literature gaps and to present the need for further development in the area of study.
Methods/instruments/techniques used to collect the data
After you complete your analysis of the research findings (in the discussion section), you might realize that the manner in which you have collected the data or the ways in which you have measured variables has limited your ability to conduct a thorough analysis of the results.
For example, you might realize that you should have addressed your survey questions from another viable perspective, or that you were not able to include an important question in the survey. In these cases, you should acknowledge the deficiency or deficiencies by stating a need for future researchers to revise their specific methods for collecting data that includes these missing elements.
Common Limitations of the Researcher(s)
Study limitations that arise from situations relating to the researcher or researchers (whether the direct fault of the individuals or not) should also be addressed and dealt with, and remedies to decrease these limitations—both hypothetically in your study, and practically in future studies—should be proposed.
Limited access to data
If your research involved surveying certain people or organizations, you might have faced the problem of having limited access to these respondents. Due to this limited access, you might need to redesign or restructure your research in a different way. In this case, explain the reasons for limited access and be sure that your finding is still reliable and valid despite this limitation.
Time constraints
Just as students have deadlines to turn in their class papers, academic researchers might also have to meet deadlines for submitting a manuscript to a journal or face other time constraints related to their research (e.g., participants are only available during a certain period; funding runs out; collaborators move to a new institution). The time available to study a research problem and to measure change over time might be constrained by such practical issues. If time constraints negatively impacted your study in any way, acknowledge this impact by mentioning a need for a future study (e.g., a longitudinal study) to answer this research problem.
Conflicts arising from cultural bias and other personal issues
Researchers might hold biased views due to their cultural backgrounds or perspectives of certain phenomena, and this can affect a study’s legitimacy. Also, it is possible that researchers will have biases toward data and results that only support their hypotheses or arguments. In order to avoid these problems, the author(s) of a study should examine whether the way the research problem was stated and the data-gathering process was carried out appropriately.
Steps for Organizing Your Study Limitations Section
When you discuss the limitations of your study, don’t simply list and describe your limitations—explain how these limitations have influenced your research findings. There might be multiple limitations in your study, but you only need to point out and explain those that directly relate to and impact how you address your research questions.
We suggest that you divide your limitations section into three steps: (1) identify the study limitations; (2) explain how they impact your study in detail; and (3) propose a direction for future studies and present alternatives. By following this sequence when discussing your study’s limitations, you will be able to clearly demonstrate your study’s weakness without undermining the quality and integrity of your research.
Step 1. Identify the limitation(s) of the study
- This part should comprise around 10%-20% of your discussion of study limitations.
The first step is to identify the particular limitation(s) that affected your study. There are many possible limitations of research that can affect your study, but you don’t need to write a long review of all possible study limitations. A 200-500 word critique is an appropriate length for a research limitations section. In the beginning of this section, identify what limitations your study has faced and how important these limitations are.
You only need to identify limitations that had the greatest potential impact on: (1) the quality of your findings, and (2) your ability to answer your research question.

Step 2. Explain these study limitations in detail
- This part should comprise around 60-70% of your discussion of limitations.
After identifying your research limitations, it’s time to explain the nature of the limitations and how they potentially impacted your study. For example, when you conduct quantitative research, a lack of probability sampling is an important issue that you should mention. On the other hand, when you conduct qualitative research, the inability to generalize the research findings could be an issue that deserves mention.
Explain the role these limitations played on the results and implications of the research and justify the choice you made in using this “limiting” methodology or other action in your research. Also, make sure that these limitations didn’t undermine the quality of your dissertation .

Step 3. Propose a direction for future studies and present alternatives (optional)
- This part should comprise around 10-20% of your discussion of limitations.
After acknowledging the limitations of the research, you need to discuss some possible ways to overcome these limitations in future studies. One way to do this is to present alternative methodologies and ways to avoid issues with, or “fill in the gaps of” the limitations of this study you have presented. Discuss both the pros and cons of these alternatives and clearly explain why researchers should choose these approaches.
Make sure you are current on approaches used by prior studies and the impacts they have had on their findings. Cite review articles or scientific bodies that have recommended these approaches and why. This might be evidence in support of the approach you chose, or it might be the reason you consider your choices to be included as limitations. This process can act as a justification for your approach and a defense of your decision to take it while acknowledging the feasibility of other approaches.
P hrases and Tips for Introducing Your Study Limitations in the Discussion Section
The following phrases are frequently used to introduce the limitations of the study:
- “There may be some possible limitations in this study.”
- “The findings of this study have to be seen in light of some limitations.”
- “The first is the…The second limitation concerns the…”
- “The empirical results reported herein should be considered in the light of some limitations.”
- “This research, however, is subject to several limitations.”
- “The primary limitation to the generalization of these results is…”
- “Nonetheless, these results must be interpreted with caution and a number of limitations should be borne in mind.”
- “As with the majority of studies, the design of the current study is subject to limitations.”
- “There are two major limitations in this study that could be addressed in future research. First, the study focused on …. Second ….”
For more articles on research writing and the journal submissions and publication process, visit Wordvice’s Academic Resources page.
And be sure to receive professional English editing and proofreading services , including paper editing services , for your journal manuscript before submitting it to journal editors.
Wordvice Resources
Proofreading & Editing Guide
Writing the Results Section for a Research Paper
How to Write a Literature Review
Research Writing Tips: How to Draft a Powerful Discussion Section
How to Captivate Journal Readers with a Strong Introduction
Tips That Will Make Your Abstract a Success!
APA In-Text Citation Guide for Research Writing
Additional Resources
- Diving Deeper into Limitations and Delimitations (PhD student)
- Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Limitations of the Study (USC Library)
- Research Limitations (Research Methodology)
- Sample Size Calculation (US National Library of Medicine)
- How to Present Limitations and Alternatives (UMASS)
Article References
Pearson-Stuttard, J., Kypridemos, C., Collins, B., Mozaffarian, D., Huang, Y., Bandosz, P.,…Micha, R. (2018). Estimating the health and economic effects of the proposed US Food and Drug Administration voluntary sodium reformulation: Microsimulation cost-effectiveness analysis. PLOS. https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002551
Xu, W.L, Pedersen, N.L., Keller, L., Kalpouzos, G., Wang, H.X., Graff, C,. Fratiglioni, L. (2015). HHEX_23 AA Genotype Exacerbates Effect of Diabetes on Dementia and Alzheimer Disease: A Population-Based Longitudinal Study. PLOS. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001853
We use cookies on this site to enhance your experience
By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.
A link to reset your password has been sent to your email.
Back to login
We need additional information from you. Please complete your profile first before placing your order.
Thank you. payment completed., you will receive an email from us to confirm your registration, please click the link in the email to activate your account., there was error during payment, orcid profile found in public registry, download history, how to write the limitations of your research.
- Charlesworth Author Services
- 07 December, 2021
No experiment is perfect – there is always room for improvement. An important part of writing up your research into a paper or dissertation involves being open and honest about what you think you could have done better , or what you would do differently if you were to repeat the experiment. Being clear about these aspects helps other researchers to improve experiments in the future , and guides them towards avenues of future research. This article offers some advice for deciding which limitations to include and how to frame them in your writing.
Look at the overall research, not the small details
In other words, focus on the bigger picture. Early career researchers (ECRs) can often get preoccupied with minor methodological details, like not having exactly equal groups in your sample. Small issues like this are unlikely to have had a major influence on the quality of your results , so steer clear of focusing on them.
Instead, consider which principal elements of your research design you would change if you were to conduct this study again. For instance, consider…
Would you have used different measures? Should you have built in attention checks? Would the experiment have been more effective if it was split up into smaller chunks? Should you have used more targeted efforts to recruit more participants from different groups? Do you now feel that your methodology wasn’t the most appropriate one to use?
What else would have been more suitable, and why? In other words, you want to consider the factors that you believe have had the biggest and most significant effect on your results .
Consider how much your findings differ from your research questions
You should also consider whether – and how – your results may differ significantly from what you hypothesised (or your research question ), or whether they diverge greatly from other research in the area. If so, then explore and explain the reasons why this might be the case, and include recommendations for how such issues might be addressed or resolved by other researchers.
Offer suggestions for future research
It is also useful, in the limitations, to lay out avenues for future research.
What are the key questions that you think your research raises? What areas were you not able to investigate further within the scope of this research project? How might others start answering those areas?
In conclusion
A good limitations section (or part, if it’s not a separate section) acknowledges any weaknesses or problems in the research study, while also outlining any lessons that you have learnt from the process. It should also give the reader an idea of any outstanding issues, questions or gaps that need to be addressed and priorities for future research arising from your results.
Maximise your publication success with Charlesworth Author Services.
Charlesworth Author Services, a trusted brand supporting the world’s leading academic publishers, institutions and authors since 1928.
To know more about our services, visit: Our Services
Share with your colleagues
Related articles.

How to identify Gaps in research and determine your original research topic
Charlesworth Author Services 14/09/2021 00:00:00

Tips for designing your Research Question
Charlesworth Author Services 01/08/2017 00:00:00

How to write the Statement of a Problem
Charlesworth Author Services 19/11/2021 00:00:00
Related webinars

Bitesize Webinar: How to write and structure your academic article for publication- Module 3: Understand the structure of an academic paper
Charlesworth Author Services 04/03/2021 00:00:00

Bitesize Webinar: How to write and structure your academic article for publication: Module 4: Prepare to write your academic paper

Bitesize Webinar: How to write and structure your academic article for publication: Module 9:Write a strong results and discussion section
Charlesworth Author Services 05/03/2021 00:00:00

Bitesize Webinar: How to write and structure your academic article for publication: Module 11: Know when your article is ready for submission
Article sections.

How to write an Introduction to an academic article
Charlesworth Author Services 17/08/2020 00:00:00

Tips for writing the Results section in a scientific paper
Charlesworth Author Services 27/10/2021 00:00:00

Writing an effective Discussion section in a scientific paper
Thesis Helpers

Find the best tips and advice to improve your writing. Or, have a top expert write your paper.
Your Guide to Writing Limitations of a Study Section

Are you working on your thesis, dissertation, or research paper? One of the sections that you must include, and do it properly is the limitations. So, what is study limitations and how do you go about it?
Table of Contents
- 1. What are the limitations of a research study?
- 2. Importance of including limitations in research
- 3. Examples of limitations of a study
- 3.1. Methodological Related Limitations
- 3.2. Limitations of the Researcher
- 4. How to write limitations of a study
- 5. Tips for writing research limitations
What Are The Limitations of a Research Study?
What are the limitations in a study? Limitations of a study are the hurdles, call them characteristics of your study design, which impact the interpretation of the findings.
They challenge generalizability and use of the findings as you had anticipated when selecting the research design. Understanding these limitations helps you to explain to the reader how they impacted the results and the conclusion, in line with your study design.
Importance of Including Limitations in Research
While some researchers feel that highlighting the limitations in research undermine the value of their studies in the eyes of the reader, the reverse is indeed true. Here are some key reasons why you need to include them:
- Helps you to answer the questions that your professor might ask
When professors mark students’ papers, one of the areas they check keenly is the limitations of the study. So, instead of waiting for your teacher to ask about research limitations, risking lower grades because you ignored the section, you should make sure to include them.
- Limitations of research studies offer you the chance to point at areas that need further studies
If the limitations you encountered during your study impacted the findings of the research, you could demonstrate how further studies might be crucial in giving answers to unanswered questions.
- Clearly presented limitations show that you understand the research problem well
When you finally present your research findings, the assessment committee expects to see professionally done work. Therefore, carefully presenting the limitations of research implies that you thought about the study problem, did ample review of the related literature, and analyzed the selected methods.
When presenting the study limitations, it is important to appreciate that you need to go beyond listing them. Target answering the question: “Do the study limitations impact on the findings and their validity?” and “If they do, to what extent?” So, go ahead and explain them to the readers so that they do not point at gaps in your finished study.
Examples Of Limitations Of A Study
When carrying out your study, there are many challenges, but it is crucial to restrict the focus to the limitations that are closely related to the research problem. When writing about limitations in a study, make sure to use the past tense. Here are common limitations when doing research:
Methodological Related Limitations
Sample Size
The number of units that you will use for study is determined by the type of research problem that you are addressing. If the sample is too small, you are likely to find it challenging to establish the relationships between the different variables. Note that if you are doing a qualitative study, the sample size will be less relevant, especially if it was explained well in the research problem.
Lack of available or reliable data
If you do not have enough data or it is unreliable, there is a danger of your study’s scope being limited or failing to find meaningful relationship in your study. So, make sure to carefully describe these imitations, explaining why you think the data is unreliable or missing. This is also a perfect opportunity to call for further studies in order to fill the gap.
Lack of prior research on the topic
When doing research, you are required to carry a comprehensive review of the available literature to lay a strong foundation for better understanding of the problem being investigated. Depending on the nature and the scope of the topic, it is not uncommon to find areas that are poorly studied. To avoid the problem, you should start by carefully assessing the availability of related studies. For example, you should check with different libraries to establish the availability of prior studies.
Measuring the collected data
After interpreting the findings of the study, you might establish that the manner in which you gathered the data limited the ability to do a thorough analysis. For example, you might regret failing to add specific questions that could have helped address an issue that arose later in your research. So, acknowledge this challenge and point at the need for further studies to review the method of data collection.
Limitations of the Researcher
One of the common limitations in research is poor access to things such as documents, organizations or people. In such a situation, you should clearly state the reasons for getting denied access to the targeted source of information.
Longitudinal Impacts
Unlike your teacher who can commit years to study a selected problem, the timeframe for completing your assignment is likely to be limited. So, be sure to select a topic that does not need a lot of time to complete.
Cultural related bias
Cultural bias is one of the common examples of limitations in research that can have significant implications on a study’s findings. Well, whether people are conscious or not, they always have some biases. In most cases, this is negative, though it is also possible to get positive biases. Be extra careful when proofreading your work to note cases of bias in the selected data, sample or other details. If the resources you are using have instances of bias, ensure to acknowledge and explain your effort to void it.
Language barrier
If your study involves dealing with people using different languages, communication can be a major barrier. For example, if you are studying the effectiveness of a certain study model on students learning English as a second language, you are likely to experience language related challenges. So, make sure to acknowledge them.
How to Write Limitations Of a Study
When working on your research, information about the limitations is placed at the start of the discussion chapter/section of the paper. This implies that your reader will understand the limitations before getting deeper into the analysis. In other cases, limitations are brought out when concluding the discussion of your research, highlighting the need for further study.
Note: You should not hide the discussion in the middle of the report’s discussion. If you must, it is important to restate the limitations when concluding the discussion section.
If you establish that the study limitations have severely flawed your research, such as being unable to acquire essential data, it is advisable to consider your work as an exploratory study to serve as groundwork for later studies. In such a situation, try to be as specific as possible, explaining in what ways the flaws can be addressed.
When preparing a research paper, the limitations should not be an excuse for failing to do your work thoroughly. Remember that if the limitations are severe, it is an indication that your research problem was too narrow or the issue under consideration is too recent.
Here are some important things you need to do when writing your research limitations.
- Be concise but ensure every limitation is well explained.
- Clearly explain why the limitations in your study exist.
- Explain why it was impossible to overcome the study limitations.
- Show the impact of the limitations in relation to the study findings and conclusion.
- Where appropriate, show how the limitations demonstrate the need for additional studies.
Tips For Writing Research Limitations
Now that we have looked at different research limitations, here are some useful tips to help you write them well and enjoy higher grades.
- Do not inflate the findings of your study.
When writing research results, overemphasizing the findings can be misconstrued to mean that you are hiding the limitations. Therefore, make sure to report the results as you find them and show how the limitations affected them. You might need to check some examples of limitations in an experiment or other types of research by experts are done.
- If the results are negative, they are not limitations.
If you get negative results, it implies that they are challenging your hypothesis as opposed to supporting it. In such a situation, you should consider reformulating your hypothesis. Another cause of negative results might be stumbling unto something that was not expected.
- Go for the right sample size, especially in qualitative study
If you are carrying qualitative research, a smaller sample size might be ample because gathering more data does not necessarily result in more information. To determine the right sample size in qualitative studies is mainly dependent on your judgment, including experience in the evaluation of qualitative data. So, if the sample is considered a limitation for your study, it could be an indication of your judgment on the selected methodology.
- Check other study limitations examples and how they were presented.
One of the best ways of learning how to present your limitations is checking what others have done. Particularly, you should compare limitations in research examples to see how they were presented.
When working on your paper’s research limitations, it is prudent to be as clear and precise as possible. If you find this challenging, consider seeking writing help. The assistance is offered by experts who understand what limitations of a study are, and know how to present them well in your paper.

Make PhD experience your own
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.
- Essay types
How to Write a Research Paper: Key Findings and Limitations
Date published: 27 Nov 2022
Format: APA
Academic level: College
Paper type: Research Paper
Downloads: 0
The aim of this research was to explore the connections between obesity and many facets of the food home environment and in the vicinity. For the variables at each level, descriptive statistics is determined. Standard deviations and means were then identified for constant variables and estimation percentages equal to one for binary variables. The core study of multilevel data structure accounting was based on various logistic intercept models of the area, the household and individual random elements.
Research Results
The findings of the research found that about one third of the whole samples were overweight and another third were obese. This got associated with the figures from the polls of other national authorities. The adult group had a mean of 28.50 BMI equivalent to an estimate by 28.7 for adults in the United States, based on estimated weights and heights between 2009 and 2010. Over 85% of the households were not Hispanic whites and other over half had a college-learned head of the family. Two members were in the household and the average income was reported at 69,000 dollars. However, almost all individual demographic and lifestyle was largely assoc8iated with obesity or overweight ( Morland & Evenson, 2009 ). Results indicated that age was positively associated with overweight status or obesity, also being a woman was negatively influenced with overweight status. Also, a higher diet level was related to being overweight. Broadly, regular exercise was negatively affected by obesity probability of overweight or obesity. Household-level measures showed several socioeconomic disparities in overweight status.
Want a custom paper like this sample?
Entrust your assignment to our professional writers and they will compose a custom paper specially for you.
Results Differences between Groups
The primary calculation of food at home was carried out in a layout compatible with dietary efficiency indices of other scientists. Increased conformity with U.S. citizens' dietary practices was associated with lower obesity risk. Mixed findings were observed for the association between food variables in the community and obesity. In the metro subsample, a food desert measure was positive for obesity ( Chen et al., 2016 ). There were no healthy patterns in relationships between densities of different store types, and obesity levels had no healthy patterns. However, some mixed results were equal to those of other researchers.
Limitations of the Study
Broadly, there were several notable problems encountered in the survey. Next, instead of applying conventional reflective approaches like food frequency questionnaires or 24-hour repetitions, the investigation made use of data from the scanner to offer hypothetically more reliable home experience data. This data showed acquisitions rather than intakes. The scanner details and the USDAScore measurement just compensated for food shopping at home and not food from home. The researcher sought to minimize the effect of statistically missed food-removal variables by testing fast-food intake through the results in the MedProfiler data collection. Second, the analysis relied on IRI's MedProfiler's self-reported results, which may be subject to many errors. The review on past studies comparing self-reported with measured heights and weights finalized that weights are underreported and heights over-reported, which leads to underestimating BMIs.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Statistical Method Used
Data used in this study is secondary data. It means it is borrowed from other sources. The most noticeable advantage of applying secondary data is that it is cost-effective. This is because someone already collected that data, and the researching parties do not have to spend a lot of time and money into the data collecting stages of their study. For instance, in the research, data used was from the US Census Bureau County Business Patterns, information from IRi Consumer Panel Scanner (2008-2012), and the supplementary MedProfiler figures set (2012).
The most significant disadvantage of using secondary data in the analysis is that the data does not answer the researcher's questions to the extent they would want. It means that the secondary data might not have precise information for the researcher. For instance, in the study, the scanner records indicated acquisitions instead of consumption. Plus, the scanner information and the USDAScore portion incorporated buying of “food-at-home” only and not “food away from home.”
Limitations of the Study Method Used
Descriptive research design is used in this study, and its main purpose is to describe, explain, and validate findings. A significant limitation of descriptive research is that it cannot verify the research problem statistically. It is nearly impossible to identify the cause behind the described phenomenon. This data cannot be proven statistically because the information used is from the already collected information.
References
Chen, D., Jaenicke, E., & Volpe, R. (2016). Food Environments and Obesity: Household Diet Expenditure versus Food Deserts. American Journal of Public Health , 106 (5), 881-888. doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303048
Morland, K., & Evenson, K. (2009). Obesity prevalence and the local food environment. Health & Place , 15 (2), 491-495. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.09.004
Real Estate Analysis: How to Do It Right
Confidence Intervals: How to Calculate and Interpret
Get to know the price estimate for your paper
- Research Paper
- Book Report
- Movie Review
- Annotated Bibliography
- High School
Related essays
We post free essay examples for college on a regular basis. Stay in the know!
Pros and Cons of the Monte Carlo Simulation
Words: 2519
Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient (Spearman's Rho)
Categorical variables in the research process, the best video games of 2021 (so far), how to model health care costs, statistics and research, it’s time to jumpstart your paper.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
By clicking “Proceed”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.
Research paper limitations examples. How to write Limitations of Research 2022-11-03
A research paper is a detailed and systematic study of a particular topic that aims to explore and evaluate existing knowledge on the subject, as well as to present new findings and insights. While research papers can be a valuable source of information and can contribute significantly to our understanding of various phenomena, they are not without limitations. In this essay, we will discuss some examples of limitations that can affect research papers.
One common limitation of research papers is the sample size. The sample size refers to the number of participants or cases that are included in the study. A small sample size can limit the generalizability of the findings, as the results may not be representative of the entire population. For instance, a study that is based on a small sample of college students may not be applicable to the general population, as the results may not be representative of the entire population of college students, let alone the entire population.
Another limitation of research papers is the study design. Different research designs have different strengths and limitations, and the choice of design can significantly affect the validity and reliability of the findings. For example, a randomized controlled trial is generally considered to be a high-quality research design, as it allows researchers to control for potential confounders and minimize bias. However, it may not be feasible or ethical to conduct a randomized controlled trial in certain situations, such as when the research involves sensitive topics or vulnerable populations.
Another limitation of research papers is the self-report bias. Many research studies rely on self-report measures, such as surveys or questionnaires, to collect data. However, self-report measures are prone to bias, as participants may not accurately report their thoughts, feelings, or behaviors. For instance, people may underreport or overreport certain behaviors due to social desirability bias, which refers to the tendency to present oneself in a favorable light.
A further limitation of research papers is the external validity. External validity refers to the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other populations or settings. Research studies that are conducted in a controlled laboratory setting may not have high external validity, as the results may not be applicable to real-world situations. Additionally, research studies that are conducted in a specific geographical area may not be applicable to other regions or countries, as cultural and societal factors may influence the results.
In conclusion, research papers have several limitations that can affect their validity and reliability. These limitations include the sample size, study design, self-report bias, and external validity. Researchers should carefully consider these limitations when interpreting the results of research studies and should strive to minimize their impact on the findings.
What are Research Limitations, Scope of Study & Strength

The information technology world is rapidly advancing and it is vital that business adopt new technologies so as to experience the potential benefits. The limitations of the study are those characteristics of design or methodology that impacted or influenced the application or interpretation of the results of your study. Therefore, the number of individuals who needed orthodontic services increased. It also allows researchers to speculate and insert themselves more into the research study. If this happens, acknowledge it and let your readers know.
How Do You Write Limitations In A Research Paper?

. In California, for example, statutes of limitations for slander or libel claims typically prevent any such claim being initiated more than one year after the action. Your basic goal is to discuss the ones that relate to the Limitations of your Common Limitations of the Researchers Limitations related to the researcher must also be written and shown to readers. It could be in the samples you offer or any other detail in your research. Social Cognition is the science of the processes undergone by people in analyzing social information that involves the retrieval, encoding, application and storage to social circumstances. Moreover, given the gaps in research and specificity of this proposal, the significance of this proposal was.
Limitations Research Paper – Free Examples for Every Occasion

No one is perfect. You need to explain the cause of limited access to your readers. Instead, keep the limitations crisp and short. Though you might get positive cultural bias, in most cases, this is a negative issue. . This collection might involve memory recall and self-assessment. Time Limits Needless to say, all the researchers have their deadlines when they need to complete their studies.
Limitations Research Paper Examples That Really Inspire
. Practical limitations Practical limitations in research are often associated with time and budget. People have conjured up different endeavors of sports to entertain them; however, soccer has been dominant over all the others, why has this been so? How to structure your research limitations correctly There are strict rules to structure this section of your academic paper where you need to justify and explain its potential weaknesses. The second section of this paper will discuss the purpose of this study, rationale and research questions related the topic. In case you need some extra help with your papers you can always ask professionals to take care of it. The third section of this paper will describe the methodology used to answer these questions and limitations in this study.
Limitations in Research: Writing about Your Study Limitations

For example, participants in a drug trial may experience side effects due to the active treatment group. . The definition of a limitation is a restriction or a defect, or the act of imposing restrictions. Any research paper is based on the hypothesis, datum, and methodology. Moreover, this insufficiency in data could be the outcome of your study design. If the sources you are using for your report have any form of bias, acknowledge it and explain the effort you used to avoid it. So, for example, if you conducted the research too early in the day, too late in the evening, or too quickly.
Limitations in Research
However, this can help you understand how you can narrow down the formulation of research goals and objectives, thereby increasing the focus of your study. In such situations, you might be late in your data collection. . North Korea's nuclear weapons program is begun in the 1950's when the United Nations General Assembly set up an international atomic energy agency that would help the spread of peaceful atomic energy. Most businesses and activities can now be done in the internet for those on the go and would need some time to bond with friends or settle important paperwork. They produce more issues in interpreting your findings. .
How to write Limitations of Research
Article 1: Patterns of Anxiety in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilatory Support This research study was done by Chlan and Savik, 2011 in an attempt to explore on the anxiety patterns in the ICU patients using mechanical ventilation support. For example, if data is collected using the wrong units of measurement or incorrect scales. The Act also marks the beginning of the modern law of limitations governing personal actions in common law Lowenthal 1950 and served as the model adopted by many American legislatures Heriot 1992. Theoretical limitations Many research questions cannot be answered by empirical data alone. This article will give you an overview of how to write a biography using some key points to help you on your way. Write a few drafts to see how this section will fit in the text.
Statutes Of Limitations Research Paper
We are all subject to imperfections. Chapter One: General Introduction - Introduction Public sector projects are an essential aspect of development and service delivery. Type II errors occur when there is no difference between groups, but the null hypothesis was false. What are the limitations? On that note, every study, no matter how proficient the writer may be, has study limitations. Always acknowledge a study's limitations. .

- Limitations in Research: Writing about Your Study Limitations
- Limitations in Research: Best Tips and Examples for Everyone
What are the limitations in research?
Types of limitations in research, best tips on organizing study limitations, to conclude.
All of us encountered the term limitations in research at least once in academic paper writing . Usually, we interpret it as something bad. However, when it comes to your studies, restraints can actually become a positive thing. We have written an article about limitations in research which would explain not only what the limitations are, but also how to use them in your study.
Limitations in research are restrictions and constraints which have been put on your methodology of study and exploration process in general. Unfortunately, many researchers don’t work with restraints and ignore them. They do so because they feel like if they do actually determine some of the limitations, their work will not be valued as much. Limitations depend on the different types of research design . Of course, this is not the true cause. Every study should have its limits. If you want your work to be accurate, the research limitations section should be a must-have for your study. The truth is that each study has its flaws and negative sides, but this fact does not ultimately make writing your case study worse. Here are the key rules you should follow:
- Acknowledge the research limitations of your study before someone else does.
- Remember: problems and flaws can actually give you a chance to continue and develop your studies. You might get questions without any answer, and to get them, you need to know which restraints you had in a previous paper.
- Mentioning limitations can actually show your skills of critical analysis. During your research, you go through a lot of literature, i.e. literature review and experiments. When you come up with not only observations but also understanding of the flaws of your study, you take a step towards making your paper better.
- Sample size/sample bias. For example, let’s say 100 hundred people should participate in your survey. Each person may give you individual results, but it does not mean that the same results belong to the whole population.
- Access to data. You will not always be able to go through all the resources. You can’t gather all the data you want for your research since it will take a lot of time. Because of it, your work might not cover each aspect.
- Lack of time. Often deadlines are the reason why your study and research might not be complete. When we get a task, we have a limited amount of time to do it. To get a good grade, we need to submit the assignment prior to the deadline.
- Financial resources. Sometimes we need some equipment or additional software to conduct the research. This might be a problem since we don’t always have the sum we need.
- Data collection. There are different ways to collect data: interviews, surveys, questionnaire, etc. The way you collect data might be a real limitation since the answers and the results vary.
- Method. When you are finding new information, you use a specific research method and research methodology . Different methods give you various opportunities. Quality of the datum you get often depends on the method you choose.
Here are some tips on how to organize a discussion about research limitations for your studies.
- Identify the restraints of your work. What are the limitations that affected your study? How did they influence your conclusion? Answer these questions and come up with the review of all possible limitations and why they are important for your studies.
- Describe these restraints and explain why they took their place. This section should be short and give more details about what you have encountered in your research. Talk about the importance of the obstacles of your work and how they affect it. Don’t be ashamed to talk about it since it’s a normal thing: there are no perfect studies and researches.
- Structure your research limitations. Firstly, write a list of all the restraints you had. Create a plan for this part and think how long you would like it to be. Write a few drafts to see how this section will fit in the text.
- Give some thoughts on your future studies. Which mistakes would you try to avoid and how? Think about the perspective of additional studies. Note problems that you had and try to solve them when working on your next paper.
Limitations are a great way to have an open discussion about what did you discover and how your findings were influenced by these limits. Negative sides of your study can actually help you make your research better. Learn from the mistakes, and do your best to improve your work. In case you need some extra help with your papers you can always ask professionals to take care of it.
How to write limitations in a research paper

Full-text Article. In this article, we provide some guidelines for writing about research limitations, show examples of some frequently seen study limitations, and recommend techniques for presenting this information. Embrace that. They are a basic foundation for any researcher who must use them to achieve a set q specific email vs letter writing essay or how to write limitations in a research paper. Becker, H. However, depending how to write limitations in a research paper the scope of your fesearch topic, prior research studies that are relevant to your thesis might be limited. Other limitations. View our Scientific Editing Package. Why are limitations so important? In other words, clearly describing the limitations of your study should only strengthen your work! Sign up for a free trial today. And be sure to receive professional English editing and proofreading services for your journal manuscript before submitting it to journal editors. Answered by Editage Insights on 22 May, When conducting a study, it is important to have a sufficient sample size in order to draw valid conclusions. To learn in depth how to write an effective results section, check out this course designed exclusively for researchers: How to write the most effective results and discussion sections.
Examples of limitations in research papers. What are the limitations in research and how to write them? 2022-10-25
In research, limitations refer to any factors that constrain the scope or results of a study. These limitations can come in various forms, including methodological, practical, ethical, or theoretical. It is important for researchers to acknowledge and discuss these limitations in their research papers, as they can impact the validity and generalizability of the findings. Here are some examples of limitations that may be present in research papers:
Sample size: The sample size of a study refers to the number of participants or cases being studied. A small sample size can be a limitation, as it may not be representative of the larger population and may limit the ability to generalize the findings.
Sampling bias: Sampling bias occurs when the sample of participants or cases is not representative of the population of interest. This can be a limitation, as the findings may not be applicable to the larger population.
Study design: The design of a study can also be a limitation. For example, a cross-sectional study, which only measures variables at one point in time, may not be able to establish cause and effect relationships.
Data quality: The quality of the data collected can also be a limitation. For example, if the data is unreliable or invalid, it may affect the accuracy of the findings.
Ethical considerations: Ethical considerations, such as protecting the privacy and well-being of participants, can also be a limitation. For example, certain types of research, such as studies involving vulnerable populations or sensitive topics, may require additional ethical safeguards.
Funding constraints: Funding constraints can also be a limitation, as they may limit the resources available for the study, including the sample size and duration of the study.
In conclusion, limitations in research papers are important to consider, as they can affect the validity and generalizability of the findings. It is important for researchers to acknowledge and discuss these limitations in their research papers in order to provide a balanced and comprehensive understanding of the results.
What are the limitations in research and how to write them?
. You could use the limitations of research as a great opportunity to take on a new challenge and improve the future of research. What Is The Weakness Of Qualitative Research? Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. As such, you may have to rewrite or re-design your study. Researchers should also establish an oversight level by referring to peer-review procedures or an ethics committee. Various researches have been made to explore the correlation of these trends and the consequences of being a victim as well as the effects of having criminal record to the offender and to the society Wheelock and Uggen, 2006, p. Cicely Saunders Loscalzo, 2008.
Limitations Research Paper – Free Examples for Every Occasion

Tell readers more about the constraints you encountered during research. This paper will provide beginner trainers that look to advance their physique development with adequate information and descriptions so that they can perform the movement with ease. Introduction Telegraph This is a long distance transmission of messages without physical contact of the sender and the receiver. Mentioning limitations of correlational research, for instance, can show your critical analysis skills. The long-term effects of parental alienation on adult children: A qualitative research study.
Limitations Research Paper Examples That Really Inspire

Logistic regression is used to obtain OR the odds ratio as a useful measure of association between outcome and variables. And this can affect studies, yet data from researchers can help the same institutions. Therefore there has been a growing need for retail stores to address diverse factors even beyond the marketing mix. The political leaders as well as the leaders of law enforcement agencies realize the necessity to be upgraded, to have new priorities, strategies and innovations to encounter the constantly growing threats of computer crime. The measure used to collect data After finishing your analysis of the findings, you realize that the method you used to collect data limited your capacity to undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the findings.
Limitations in Research: Writing about Your Study Limitations

The country enjoys no and low carbon energy sources including hydropower, wind, biomass, nuclear power as well as power generated from the waves at the coastal regions. And this shows thought transparency while reassuring readers that the researcher chose the best approach, despite the possible laminations. Consequently, they do not tap a substantial data amount. How to structure your research limitations correctly There are strict rules to structure this section of your academic paper where you need to justify and explain its potential weaknesses. The main reason for doing.
Limitations of a Study: The Complete Guide

Read on this guide from our dissertation writing service if you are struggling to answer this question. Therefore, connect the limitations of your study to the suggestions you make for further research. Until then, the use of social media was entirely described as bringing people from different parts of the world together to socialize and update one another on the various cultural and social activities around them. You might have formulated research aims and objectives too broadly. Limitation is stated to mention the constraints which impact the ability to research in the research paper. Health disparity refers to the overall difference related to prevalence, incidence, mortality, disease burden as well as other unfavorable health determinants that exist unequally among individuals or populations. Almost half the Americans believe that clean water is one the fundamental rights of every citizen.
Limitations in Research: Best Writing Tips For Students
Innovations in QAOs and other features of quality programs are being used by STAs across the country on projects with both traditional DBB delivery and alternative delivery methods. It is important to note that if your sample is too small, finding significant connections in the data will be challenging, as statistical tests typically require a larger sample size to ensure a fair representation and this can be limiting. . During your research, you go through a lot of literature, i. However, a researcher can avoid this limitation by eliminating prejudiced or emotional attitudes towards their topic and conflict of interest. For example, general 30-year statutes of limitation for civil actions operate in France and Germany Martindale-Hubbell 2000. Common Study Limitations Each study can have unique limitations.
Statutes Of Limitations Research Paper

Scientists can be bias. This is mainly because you do not have many years of Have you ever faced a challenge of writing the limitations of research study in your paper? Sometimes you might even need to hire a What are the Limitations of a Study Research? Writing limitations should be a subjective process. Time Limits Needless to say, all the researchers have their deadlines when they need to complete their studies. After presenting your research findings, your assessment committee wants to see that you did your work professionally. However, most students encounter common study limitations when writing academic papers. Additionally, acknowledge the limitations you encounter when conducting your research in the conclusion.
What are examples of limitations in research?

In California, for example, statutes of limitations for slander or libel claims typically prevent any such claim being initiated more than one year after the action. For example, if conducting a meta-analysis of the secondary data has not been stated as your research objective, no need to mention it as your research limitation. Lack of previous studies in the research area. If your sample size is very small, statistical tests will fail to identify important relationships or connections within a particular data set. Needless to say, this may impact your whole study or research paper.
How To Write Scope and Delimitation of a Research Paper (With Examples)
Table of contents, watch video: how to write scope and delimitation how to write scope and delimitation... please enable javascript how to write scope and delimitation of a research paper if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-1','ezslot_11',624,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-1-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-1','ezslot_12',624,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-1-0_1'); if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-1','ezslot_13',624,'0','2'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-1-0_2'); .leader-1-multi-624{border:noneimportant;display:blockimportant;float:noneimportant;line-height:0;margin-bottom:15pximportant;margin-left:autoimportant;margin-right:autoimportant;margin-top:15pximportant;max-width:100%important;min-height:250px;min-width:300px;padding:0;text-align:centerimportant}, what is the scope and delimitation of a research paper, where should i put the scope and delimitation, why should i write the scope and delimitation of my research paper, what is the difference between delimitation and limitation, how to write scope and delimitation: step-by-step guide, 1. review your study’s objectives and problem statement.
Your study’s coverage relies on its objectives. Thus, you can only write this section if you’re familiar with what exactly you’re researching. Furthermore, ensure that you understand the problems you ought to answer.
2. State the Key Information To Explain Your Study’s Coverage and Boundaries
A. the main objective of the research, b. independent and dependent variables included, c. subject of the study, d. timeframe and location of the study, e. brief description of the study’s research design and methodology, 3. indicate which variables or factors are not covered by your research.
Although you’ve already set your study’s coverage and boundaries in Step 2, you may also explicitly mention things you’ve excluded from your study.
Examples of Scope and Delimitation of a Research Paper
1. scope and delimitation examples for quantitative research, a. example 1, b. example 2, 2. scope and delimitation examples for qualitative research.
Research Title
Tips and Warnings if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-4','ezslot_34',627,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-4-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-4','ezslot_35',627,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-4-0_1'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-4','ezslot_36',627,'0','2'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-4-0_2'); if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-leader-4','ezslot_37',627,'0','3'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-leader-4-0_3'); .leader-4-multi-627{border:none!important;display:block!important;float:none!important;line-height:0;margin-bottom:3px!important;margin-left:auto!important;margin-right:auto!important;margin-top:3px!important;max-width:100%!important;min-height:250px;min-width:300px;padding:0;text-align:center!important}
1. use the “5ws and 1h” as your guide in understanding your study’s coverage, 2. use key phrases when writing your research’s scope, 3. use key phrases when writing factors beyond your research’s delimitations, 4. don’t forget to ask for help, 5. make it brief, frequently asked questions, 1. what is scope and delimitation in tagalog.
In a Filipino research ( pananaliksik ), Scope and Delimitation is called “ Saklaw at Delimitasyon”.
2. The Scope and Delimitation should consist of how many paragraphs?
References if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_39',628,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1-0'); if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_40',628,'0','1'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1-0_1'); if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_41',628,'0','2'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1-0_2'); if(typeof ez_ad_units='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_42',628,'0','3'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-filipiknow_net-mobile-leaderboard-1-0_3'); .mobile-leaderboard-1-multi-628{border:noneimportant;display:blockimportant;float:noneimportant;line-height:0;margin-bottom:3pximportant;margin-left:autoimportant;margin-right:autoimportant;margin-top:3pximportant;max-width:100%important;min-height:250px;min-width:300px;padding:0;text-align:centerimportant}, one thought on “ how to write scope and delimitation of a research paper (with examples) ”, leave a reply cancel reply, related articles:.
- Will you write my paper for me? - Yes, we will.
What we offer:, let’s write a paper for you in no time, follow these 4 simple steps and solve you problem at once.
Provide details such as your topic, the number of pages, and extra requirements, and we’ll do a paper for you in no time!
Log in to your personal account to know the current status of your paper(s). You can also turn to our support team for the same purpose. Enjoy your life while we're working on your order.
As soon as we write the paper(s) for you, check it for correctness, and if everything is good to go, just download it and enjoy the results.
Our customers’ feedback
Still hesitant just look: others have already used our services and were pleased with the results.
Thank you guys for the amazing work! I got an A, and my professor was impressed. You have done the impossible, and I will never forget your help! The best service ever!
I ordered my paper two weeks ago and received it on time. The quality is very good, much better than other companies provide. My support agent is a pro, fast and simple explanations. Thanks!
I am firmly convinced that you will never disappoint me because you haven’t done it before. Amazing approaches and solutions at perfect prices! Please continue working the way you do!
I’ve been using WritePaperFor.me for about five months, and I have nothing to complain about. Excellent quality, perfect grammar, delivery on time, nice support team, pleasant prices, amazing results.
This service helped me focus on my job, and I will never forget the support I received. I’ve got a promotion in the end! Thanks a lot for everything you do for people like me!
I have to admit that searching for a reliable and professional service was a tough quest. Nevertheless, I am happy that I managed to find writepaperforme! Everything is much better than I expected!
The best bargain is just a few clicks away!
Get an original paper that doesn’t cost a fortune!
- 450 orders completed daily
- 86 disciplines of expertise
- 820+ professionals on our team
- 4.88/5 is the average order rating
Still have questions?
Contact our support agents and let them help you!
Is it time to write a paper for you? Contact us and relish the highest academic performance!
Our professionals will do their best!
You’ll write my paper for me, won’t you? We certainly will!
So tired of writing papers that you’re starting to think of your professor’s demise? Relax, we’re only joking! However, even a joke is woven with the thread of truth, and the truth is that endless assignments are constantly nagging at you and keeping you up all night long.
‘Writing my papers is unbearable!’ you may think But you’re not alone… What if we told you that we know a magical place where professionals can write your essays so perfectly that even professors’ most sophisticated requirements will be met? You’ve probably already guessed that we’re talking about WritePaperFor.me — the most delightful, facilitating, and destressing custom paper-writing service!
We are not going to be shy about our wish to see you as our steady customer. As a result, we aren’t twiddling our thumbs but permanently improving our services; we carefully select writers who always bone up on their subjects and disciplines, and we won’t rest unless you’ve gotten your ideal paper(s). All your wishes become our unshakable rules!
Why would I ask you to write paper for me?
Despite the obvious and even natural resistance to the idea of paper writing in principle that may occur with any student, you may also ask yourself, ‘Why would I need you to help me write my paper?’ The answer to this question lies in the spectrum of your routine actions. It’s not surprising that studying becomes part of our lives, but sometimes we’ve just got too much going on!
When you write an essay or academic paper, you just do one of the numerous things you face daily or weekly. This part of your life consumes lots of energy and time, so how can you possibly get around to doing other things like having fun, working, playing sports, helping relatives, and spending time with friends?
People are social creatures, and it’s only natural of us to request help from experts.. That’s why we ask doctors, electricians, or plumbers to help us! They’re all specialists. Who writes essays for you better than you do? Right, people who write numerous essays every day. We are experts in academic writing, aimed at satisfying all your needs related to education.
You just hire a professional to get a paper written, like you normally do in other situations. Our team of writers know everything about writing your paper and can cope with assignments of any complexity and academic level. Well-researched and expertly-written papers are what we do for our customers, and we always do our work professionally so that you could kick back and enjoy your life to the fullest.
The undeniable benefits of our custom paper-writing service
Apart from a paper written in accordance with the highest standards, we provide a wide range of contributory advantages to make your life easier. Let’s take a closer look at them.
Round-the-Clock Support. Our paper-writing service works day and night to help you with all current issues. Our friendly support team is available whenever you need them, even if it’s the middle of the night. They will gladly guide you and answer all your questions on how to order customized papers or consult you about the matters at hand. Feel free to share your questions or concerns with them and get comprehensible answers.
High-Class Quality. ‘Will you write a paper for me that meets all requirements?’ This question is frequently asked by many students, and we always answer in the affirmative. Our main goal is to deliver a perfectly written paper the meets the highest possible writing standards. We don’t rest unless you are satisfied with our work. If you hire a paper writer online, we guarantee you that you get 100% original and plagiarism-free assignments of high quality.
Complete Anonymity. We value your privacy and use modern encryption systems to protect you online. We don’t collect any personal or payment details and provide all our customers with 100% anonymity. ‘Can you write a paper for me and let me stay anonymous?’ Of course, we can! We are here to help you, not to cause problems.
Fast Delivery. We completely understand how strict deadlines may be when it comes to writing your paper. Even if your paper is due tomorrow morning, you can always rely on us. Our writers meet all set deadlines unequivocally. This rule is ironclad! The offered range is wide and starts from 6 hours to 2 weeks. Which one to choose is totally up to you. On our part, we guarantee that our writers will deliver your order on time.
Free Revisions. Our mission is to hone your paper to perfection. That’s why we offer you free revisions to make everything ideal and according to your needs. Feel free to ask for revisions if there is something you would like to be changed. That’s how our paper writing service works.
Money-Back Guarantee. You can get up to a 100% refund if you are dissatisfied with our work. Nevertheless, we are completely sure of our writers’ professionalism and credibility that offer you hard-core loyalty to our guarantees.
Comprehensible Explanations. ‘Can someone write my paper for me and provide clarifications?’ This question arises from time to time. Naturally, we want you to be totally prepared for the upcoming battle with your professor. If you need to fill the gaps in your knowledge, you can always ask for clarifications related to your paper. Moreover, when you order ‘write my paper for me’ service, you can always turn to our support agents for assistance. They will be glad to provide you with the necessary information and comprehensible explanations.
Fast and Customer-Focused Solutions. ‘Is it possible to do my paper for me so that I don’t worry about it at all?’ It certainly is! We offer all-encompassing solutions to all your academic problems by defining issues, determining their causes, selecting proper alternatives, and ultimately solving them. You are free to do your favorite activities while we are taking care of ongoing matters. You can always rely on us when it comes to essay-writing online and taking an individual approach to every case.
Who will write my paper when I order it?
Another crucial advantage of our service is our writers. You may have asked yourself, ‘I’d like to pay someone to write a paper for me, but who exactly will that person be?’ Once you order a paper, our managers will choose the best writer based on your requirements. You’ll get a writer who is a true expert in the relevant subject, and a perfect fit is certain to be found due to our thorough procedure of selecting.
Every applicant passes a complex procedure of tests to become one of our permanent writers. First of all, they should provide their credentials. We need to make sure that any prospective writers we hire have the proper experience.. The next step resides in passing a series of tests related to grammar, in addition to subject and/or discipline. Every paper-writer must pass them to prove their competency and their selected field of expertise.
One more step includes writing a sample to prove the ability to research and write consistently. Moreover, we always set our heart on hiring only devoted writers. When you ask us to write your essay or other academic works, you can be sure that they always do their best to provide you with well-structured and properly-written papers of high quality.
The final chord is related to special aspects of academic paper-writing. It means that every writer is prepared to cite properly, use different styles, and so on, so you don’t have to be worried about formatting at all.
‘So, can they write an ideal paper for me?’ We answer in the affirmative because we select only the best writers for our customers. Approximately 11% of all applicants can pass the whole set of tests and are ready to help you. All writers are fully compensated for their work and are highly motivated to provide you with the best results.
We are online 24/7 so that you could monitor the process of paper-writing and contact us whenever necessary. Don’t forget that your satisfaction is our priority. Our writers fully focus on your order when it comes to the ‘write my paper’ procedure. Our managers will immediately send all the information to your writer if any corrections are required.
It’s time to write my paper! What should I do?
‘I am ready to pay to have a paper written! Where do I start?’ Our team hears these words every day. We really believe that every student should be happy. That’s why we offer you to look at the simple steps to make the process even more convenient.
- Fill in the comprehensible order form located on the main page of our website. If you need some help with it, feel free to contact our support team.
- Provide the necessary details, such as the topic, subject or discipline, paper format, your academic level, etc.
- Select the deadline, and we will strictly follow it.
- Pay the total price. Submit a preferred payment method. The full sum will be deposited into your account on our website. The money will be transferred to your writer in case you approve the paper.
- If you have additional materials provided by your professor or may simply assist in writing your paper, please attach them too. They will help the assigned writer meet your professor’s expectations.
Every paper we can write for you is expertly-researched, well-structured, and consistent. Take a look at some types of papers we can help you with:
- Dissertations
- Research papers
- Case studies
- Term papers
- Business plans, etc.
Questions like ‘I would like you to write a paper for me without destroying my reputation. Can you promise to do so?’ or ‘Can you write my paper for me cheap and fast?’ often arise, and we take pride that these options are included in the list. Your safety and anonymity are parts of our common priority, which is to make you fully satisfied with all offered services.
Moreover, our pricing policy is flexible and allows you to select the options that totally suit your needs at affordable prices. You will be pleased with the results and the amount of money spent on your order. Our managers and writers will do the rest according to the highest standards.
Don’t hesitate and hire a writer to work on your paper now!
We believe that students know what is best for them, and if you suppose that it is time to ‘write my paper right now,’ we will help you handle it. ‘Will you do my paper without any hesitation?’ Of course, we will. Our service has all the necessary prerequisites to complete assignments regardless of their difficulty, academic level, or the number of pages. We choose a writer who has vast experience and a breadth of knowledge related to your topic.
Our ‘write my paper for me’ service offers a wide range of extra features to make the ordering process even more pleasant and convenient. Unlike lots of other services, we provide formatting, bibliography, amendments, and a title page for free.
‘When you write my paper for me? Can I monitor the process?’ Naturally, you can. We understand that you may want to ensure that everything is going well. Furthermore, there may be situations when some corrections are needed. We believe that a tool like this can come in handy. The assigned writer will strictly follow your and your professor’s requirements to make sure that your paper is perfect.
‘Is it possible to write my essay from scratch?’ We don’t do just proofreading or editing. Our goal is to fully carry your burden of writing. When this or similar questions appear, we always assure our customers that our writers can do whatever they need. Apart from writing from scratch or editing and proofreading, our experts can effortlessly cope with problem-solving of all kinds;even sophisticated software assignments!
Our ‘write my paper for me’ service is good for everyone who wants to delegate paper-writing to professionals and save precious time that can be spent differently and in a more practical way. We want you to be happy by offering the great opportunity to forget about endless and boring assignments once and forever. You won’t miss anything if your papers become the concern of our professional writers.
Don’t waste your precious time browsing other services. We provide you with everything you need while you are enjoying yourself by doing things you really enjoy. ‘Write my paper then! Do my paper for me right now!’ If you are ready to exclaim these words with delight, we welcome you to our haven, a place where students spend their time serenely and never worry about papers! It’s your turn to have fun, whereas our mission is to provide you with the best papers delivered on time!
Questions our customers ask
Can someone write my paper for me.
Yes, we can. We have writers ready to cope with papers of any complexity. Just contact our specialists and let us help you.
Who can I pay to write a paper for me?
We will help you select a writer according to your needs. As soon as you hire our specialist, you’ll see a significant improvement in your grades.
Can I pay someone to write a paper for me?
Yes, you can. We have lots of professionals to choose from. We employ only well-qualified experts with vast experience in academic paper writing.
What website will write a paper for me?
WritePaperFor.me is the website you need. We offer a wide range of services to cover all your needs. Just place an order and provide instructions, and we will write a perfect paper for you.
Is it safe to use your paper writing service?
Our service is completely safe and anonymous. We don’t keep your personal and payment details and use the latest encryption systems to protect you.
What are you waiting for?
You are a couple of clicks away from tranquility at an affordable price!

IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
In a typical academic paper, research limitations may relate to: 1. Formulating your goals and objectives If you formulate goals and objectives too broadly, your work will have some shortcomings. In this case, specify effective methods or ways to narrow down the formula of goals and aim to increase your level of study focus. 2.
Examples of Limitations in Research Projects It will always be based on your writing style and tone. Remember that talking about limitations should not be a way to degrade your research paper! Discuss strengths and limitations to keep things balanced and convince your readers as they read your ideas and specific arguments.
In a typical academic paper, research limitations can relate to these points: Formulation of your objectives and aims, Implementation of your data collection methods, Sample sizes, Lack of previous studies in your chosen area, The scope of discussions. Learn to determine them in each one. Formulation of your objectives and aims
Suggest ways to overcome the limitations in future studies: Tell your readers some of the mistakes that research can avoid in future studies. Also, explain how researchers can avoid these mistakes. Consider different perspectives that future studies can take when conducting future studies.
Limitations are usually listed at the end of your Discussion section, though they can also be added throughout. Especially for a long manuscript or for an essay or dissertation, the latter may be useful for the reader. Writing on your limitations: Words and structure This study did have some limitations.
Limitations of the study is a very important part of the research. It helps future studies and researches to focus on more innovative ways to conduct research and ignore the issues faced. Be honest, pragmatic and structured while writing this section. Go through ample examples from different authors before writing your own.
The ideal way is to divide your limitations section into three steps: 1. Identify the research constraints; 2. Describe in great detail how they affect your research; 3. Mention the opportunity for future investigations and give possibilities. By following this method while addressing the constraints of your research, you will be able to ...
Possible Limitations of the Researcher. Access-- if your study depends on having access to people, organizations, data, or documents and, for whatever reason, access is denied or limited in some way, the reasons for this needs to be described.Also, include an explanation why being denied or limited access did not prevent you from following through on your study.
When discussing the limitations of your research, be sure to: Describe each limitation in detailed but concise terms; Explain why each limitation exists; Provide the reasons why each limitation could not be overcome using the method (s) chosen to gather the data [cite to other studies that had similar problems when possible];
You only need to identify limitations that had the greatest potential impact on: (1) the quality of your findings, and (2) your ability to answer your research question. Step 1: Identify and describe the limitation. Here, the model's estimates are based on potentially biased observational studies. Step 2. Explain these study limitations in detail
How to write the Limitations of your research No experiment is perfect - there is always room for improvement. An important part of writing up your research into a paper or dissertation involves being open and honest about what you think you could have done better, or what you would do differently if you were to repeat the experiment.
How to Write Limitations Of a Study When working on your research, information about the limitations is placed at the start of the discussion chapter/section of the paper. This implies that your reader will understand the limitations before getting deeper into the analysis.
The aim of this research was to explore the connections between obesity and many facets of the food home environment and in the vicinity. For the variables at each level, descriptive statistics is determined. Standard deviations and means were then identified for constant variables and estimation percentages equal to one for binary variables.
Limitations in Research: Writing about Your Study Limitations. For example, participants in a drug trial may experience side effects due to the active treatment group. . The definition of a limitation is a restriction or a defect, or the act of imposing restrictions. Any research paper is based on the hypothesis, datum, and methodology.
Acknowledge the research limitations of your study before someone else does. Remember: problems and flaws can actually give you a chance to continue and develop your studies. You might get questions without any answer, and to get them, you need to know which restraints you had in a previous paper.
Research paper limitations examples.Limitation is stated to mention the constraints which impact the ability to research in the research paper. ... How to write Limitations of Research. Of course, deviations from the general rule peculiar to each country also exist. Post navigation To edit is to make corrections to a written document, text, or ...
How to write limitations in a research paper However, researchers are often reluctant to discuss the limitations of their study in their papers, feeling that bringing up limitations may undermine its research value in the eyes of readers and reviewers. Methodological limitations are to do with the way a study was designed and carried out. The limitations of a study basically discusses any ...
Limitations Research Paper Examples That Really Inspire. ... Writing limitations should be a subjective process. Time Limits Needless to say, all the researchers have their deadlines when they need to complete their studies. After presenting your research findings, your assessment committee wants to see that you did your work professionally. ...
Basically, this portion tells two things: 1. The study's "Scope" - concepts and variables you have explored in your study and; The study's "Delimitation" - the "boundaries" of your study's scope. It sets apart the things included in your analysis from those that are excluded. For example, your scope might be the ...
Diploma verification. Each essay writer must show his/her Bachelor's, Master's, or Ph.D. diploma. Grammar test. Then all candidates complete an advanced grammar test to prove their language proficiency. Writing task. Finally, we ask them to write a small essay on a required topic. They only have 30 minutes to complete the task, and the topic is ...